I love books, and to an irrational degree.

In books, I find psychological and emotional refuge, education and deep wisdom that I just don't find elsewhere. My passion is connected to the words and the form they come in — printed pages bound together. So I'm not afraid to admit that when I read the New York Times' article about how print book sales had risen (modestly) and e-book sales had declined (a bit) and that the number of independent bookstores had increased over the past year, I shed tears of joy.

It wasn't that long ago that everyone was predicting the end of print and the demise of small bookstores. If people were reading, they were doing it digitally, and if they were buying paper books, they weren't getting them from independent shops. The future looked grim for small stores.

But more and more, we keep hearing about the resurgence of the independent bookstore and how print is not dying after all. As the Times reported, "While analysts once predicted that e-books would overtake print by 2015, digital sales have instead slowed sharply." And real book sales are up: Both Hachette and Simon & Schuster are expanding their print businesses.

And one wonderful consequence of the changing market is that bookstores are slowly coming back: "Independent bookstores, which were battered by the recession and competition from Amazon, are showing strong signs of resurgence. The American Booksellers Association counted 1,712 member stores in 2,227 locations in 2015, up from 1,410 in 1,660 locations five years ago," according to the Times.

That's hundreds of new, independent bookstores — which is just plain exciting. (I love to find local booksellers whenever I'm in a new city or town, and I know I'm not alone in that regard.)

The bookstore good news started to turn around a few years ago. The death of the big chain Borders and the drop in sales at Barnes & Noble has played a role, says Fortune. Plus, sales at independent bookstores were up about 8 percent in 2012 from the year before, according to the American Booksellers Association.

"I think the worst days of the independents are behind them," Jim Milliot, coeditorial director for Publishers Weekly magazine, told the Christian Science Monitor. "The demise of traditional print books has been a bit overblown. Everybody is a little anxious, but they are starting to think they've figured it out for the time being."

Why people want print

An opulent bookstore in Buenos Aires An opulent bookstore in Buenos Aires. (Photo: Miguel Vieira/flickr)

What media stories don't delve into are the reasons behind the stagnation in e-books and slight-but-real increase in demand for printed books. I don't think this is anything like the niche nostalgia that's driving vinyl record sales, which is still a tiny part of the huge music industry. Print book sales are still 80 percent of the market, the dominant form.

Could it be that, unlike music, there's a real decline in utility when you choose e-books over printed ones — and only a marginal gain in efficiency? Are printed books simply a superior format — as my friend David Lanphier Jr. commented on Facebook?

Yes, you can carry a number of books with you on an e-book reader, which is an undeniable bonus. But most of us are only reading a couple of books at a time, and it's not that hard to choose one or two books to carry around. For those who need larger print, e-readers are a definite win. If you live far from your local library, e-books are also a great solution.

And some people like looking up words, which is convenient with an e-reader. But in the days of smartphones, it's almost as easy to grab your phone to check, so I'd call that one a wash.

But unlike music, printed books are far sturdier and more reliable than e-readers. Many of my books have been dropped into water, partially set on fire by candles or campfires, and I hardly own a book that hasn't had soup, coffee, tea, or water splashed on it. Printed books suffer all these indignities and more: Dogs chewing on them, toddlers throwing them out the car window, or use as a seat for butt protection against damp grass. All of those books are still readable.

You can take a biography to the seaside or read in the swimming pool as I'm wont to do without concern. You can throw a mystery in your backpack and take it to the top of the mountain and not care if it starts raining or your water bottle spills on it. You can keep reading in an Oregon drizzle and then dry that poetry out next to the fire. You can place a novel over your face and nap in the sunshine, breathing printer's ink and words. You can even use the pages of a memoir to mop up a bit of blood when you fall off your mountain bike and cut your knee. (What? You've never bloodied a book?)

You can't toss a terrible e-book across the room in frustration (cough, Nicholas Sparks, cough), and of course e-book publishers have made sharing titles nigh-impossible.

Of course, if you don't like clutter, e-books are great; but if you love books, lots of them stacked up is comforting. And the used book market is still a relatively strong one, so just sell them if you don't want to keep them around. You can then buy more books, something you can't do with electronic copies of books. I buy used books for $5-8 each, then sell roughly two-thirds of them back to the bookseller for $3-4 credit. So new used books only end up costing me a few bucks, or I can put my credit towards a new title, cutting the cost below that of an e-book copy. Unless you're buying new books all the time, I've found digital copies to be a significantly more expensive way to go.

A parent reading to his two small young children.

Besides being fragile, e-readers make scanning back into a book's content difficult, because your story memory is not tied to a physical object and "spot" within it. You have to remember a word or phrase from the section you want to find. When I'm writing an article with books as reference, I find e-readers impossible to use; same with looking up a favorite few lines for reference later in my journal. And it's not just because I didn't grow up a digital native; even those who have grown up with e-readers and tablets still prefer print. According to Scholastic, "Nearly two-thirds of children (65%) — up from 2012 (60%) — agree that they’ll always want to read print books even though there are ebooks available."

And as Lanphier added to his Facebook comment about this topic, "...my 6 and 1/2 year old niece has an iPad, and she reads on it, but she will read a book too. And, will choose a book over the iPad reading... because a book has that experience. You don't see moms and kids and dads and kids gathered around the iPad reading together. But, you see them doing that with books."

Clearly, I'm thrilled books are here to stay. And it looks like the next generation will love their printed books just as I do.

Editors's note: This file has been updated with new information.

Starre Vartan ( @ecochickie ) covers conscious consumption, health and science as she travels the world exploring new cultures and ideas.