Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Tuesday, May 21, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Lifestyle › Arts & Culture
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Bible's New Testament filled with forgeries
New book by a former evangelical Christian says that nearly half of the Bible's New Testament has been forged.

By

Bryan Nelson
Wed, May 18 2011 at 8:26 PM
 56
Page from the New Testament

Photo: Doug1021/Flickr

The Bible might be the best-selling book in history, but it may also be full of lies. At least, that's the claim being made by biblical scholar and former evangelical Christian, Bart Ehrman, in a new book titled, "Forged: Writing in the Name of God — Why the Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are."
 
According to Ehrman, at least 11 of the 27 New Testament books are forgeries, while only seven of the 13 epistles attributed to Paul were probably written by him. None of the writings attributed to the Apostle Peter could have been written by him, and even the authenticity of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and John can be questioned. The book is the focus of a recent report by Discovery News.
 
"The Bible not only contains untruths of accidental mistakes. It also contains what almost anyone today would call lies," writes Ehrman, a professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
 
Ehrman builds his case by noting scores of inconsistencies in the writing styles among authors of the New Testament. Discrepancies in the language and content among books attributed to Paul are particularly glaring. Ehrman points to one example from the book of Ephesians, which is written in long Greek sentences, not the short Greek sentences used in Paul's other writings. 

Meanwhile, Ehrman claims that the authenticity of any book attributed to Peter should be doubted since Peter — like most other fisherman raised in rural Palestine at the time — was probably illiterate.
 
So the question remains: Who wrote these books and why did they attempt to conceal their identities? Ehrman says early Christian sects, struggling to legitimize themselves, would have had plenty of motivation to fabricate their religious texts.
 
"If your name was Jehoshaphat and no one had any idea who you were, you could not very well sign your own name to the book," said Ehrman. "No one would take the Gospel of Jehoshaphat seriously. If you wanted someone to read it, you called yourself Peter. Or Thomas. Or James. In other words, you lied about who you really were."
 
Ehrman's book has created a firestorm in the Christian community. In a review of the book, the Catholic Herald concedes "some New Testament books probably were not written by the people traditionally assigned as authors." But the Catholic website was also was quick to dismiss Ehrman's analysis: "the book is more provocative than insightful."
 
The Herald also said that Ehrman's book "barely mentions the concept of oral tradition. So even if a specific letter was not done by Peter or Paul, it could well have been written by someone drawing from the oral tradition passed down by one or the other."
 
But in Ehrman's view, a forgery is a forgery. If such a writing method were practiced today, it would be looked upon as deceitful and inappropriate.

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 56
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
jw1965 Aug 21 2011 at 5:50 PM

Romans3: 3,4

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Monica Jun 19 2011 at 3:38 AM

Keep regurgitating. It's not really necessary to form your own thoughts.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Jun 19 2011 at 9:27 AM

But if the Bible, claimed to be infallible by Christians, IS fallible, then Christianity has nowhere to stand. Yahweh exists because the Bible says He does, as this is the only proof we have of Him, and the Bible is true because He says it's His word. If the Bible isn't true, then Christianity is built on a shaky and crumbling foundation.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
freddy Jun 18 2011 at 11:58 AM

Perhaps, then again, perhaps not. You can't prove the existence of your particular version of God, nor can anyone disapprove it. It shouldn't matter. Believe what you will or disbelieve, whatever. Still, in the end, wouldn't any God welcome questions and exploration..... an open mind?

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Bruce in Orlando Jun 08 2011 at 7:49 AM

Genesis 6:4 "when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Blackburn Aug 18 2011 at 1:49 AM

"There were giants in the earth in those days." 6:4
Which of the two were greater, i wonder? The sons of gods or the giants in the earth.
God decides to kill all living things because the human imagination is evil. 6:5
So, the sons of gods were killed for their imagination was evil but not the giants in the earth? I guess the giants in the earth are far greater than god made men. God aint much. Giants for the win.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Jesus Jun 04 2011 at 6:01 AM

If you want to follow me then sell everything you own. That includes your nice house, iPod, your golf clubs, and your gas guzzling SUV you drive. Give all the money to the poor, whether you think they deserve it or not. Spend less money on yourself and your children and more helping people that need help.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
kirk Jun 03 2011 at 5:17 PM

I don't think the word 'fact' means what you think it means.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Jun 28 2011 at 6:54 PM

INCONCEIVABLE!!!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
inego montoya Feb 16 2012 at 2:18 PM

you keep using that word, i dont think it means what you think it means

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Bla May 25 2011 at 1:47 PM

Mankind will not be free until the last king has been strangled with the entrails of the last priest...

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Truly Free May 31 2011 at 9:00 PM

Literally, and immediately. Ignorance is not bliss, it is vile and putrid and full of hate like the minds it infests.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
tommy_temp May 25 2011 at 10:44 AM
There is Christianity. There is Paulism. Saul/Paul was Jew Pharisee, a man known to hate Christians and Christianity. He also had little caring for Gentiles. Yet suddenly one day he starts teaching a Religion he hated to people he had little caring for. Saul was never told by God of Abraham, or Jesus, or any human to go and teach Gentiles so to save them. Saul had a dark agenda of his own, to use Christianity as bait to lure Gentiles out and away from their own Religions and ways and into Christian
.... More
corrals, thus shrinking the ways competing with his Judaism. Saul/Paul was a Self Proclaimed Apostle, a fraud. His writtings used by the early catholics in their Bible making to collect mass numbers of Gentiles so to build a rich and powerful catholic church, and having a secondary interest of saving Souls.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
luvishii7
luvishii7 May 26 2011 at 1:04 PM
The beauty of Saul's life was that he was a murderer..A wretched man who killed innocent women and children for what he believed to be a righteous crusade. The bible uses Saul as a vessel and an example for even the lowest individuals that they can change by repenting and accepting the Saviour..and that is what Saul did..People living today should take Saul's life and testaments and know that the Most High doesn't care where you are in your life or the mistakes you've made. Repent and change. But
.... More
all of this really doesn't matter to those who don't believe in the first place.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
tarrant's picture
Tarrant May 25 2011 at 10:18 AM

A lively debate is welcome and encouraged at Mother Nature Network but personal attacks on other members don't make for a good debate. They also violate our Terms and Conditions, so we do remove those posts.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
bonniefortner's picture
bonniefortner May 24 2011 at 6:14 PM

wow. makes sence to me

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
watching May 24 2011 at 1:11 PM

Look at all the progressives getting their hate on! Be patient communist soldiers and soon you will be able to eradicate everyone that doesn't think the way you want them to think. Your time has come!

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Freethinker May 29 2011 at 7:49 AM

Communist soldiers? Just because someone doesnt believe in god and thinks that the bible is rubbish? Were you around during the time the events of the bible happened?(obvious answer) So everything you go to church for is based off of all BELIEFS and FAITH. There is no way around that. I respect peoples religions even though being an atheist myself. But i see reading the bible(Which i have) as being a fiction/fantasy book.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest May 25 2011 at 9:44 AM
Often in the entire canon, certain works are attributed to a particular author who did not actually write the text but was through various translations and transliteration ended up being a pat of a book written by the attributed author, e.g., two different accounts of the creation of the world in Genesis attributed as one of five books by Moses but clearly written by two different writers in two different periods of history. Does this change the inspired nature of the word of God? No, i only reiforces
.... More
why we cannot depend alone on the Bible as the basis of our Faith and why tradition is also neccesary to understand divine revelation. Much of the canon first was propagated by word of mouth from one generaton to another and was written down only much later. It still remains the inspired word of God dealing with divine revelation.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest May 25 2011 at 10:13 AM
Mr. Ehrman is about 1700 years late to the game. It is well-documented that the Council of Nicea used rounds of VOTES to decide what would ultimately turn into the NT. There was lots of political wrangling, lots of money changed hands, and at least one murder can be attributed to how the stories were cobbled together. In addition, it has been well-documented for many hundreds of years that the stories are cobbled together from various religions of the area. Christianity is not original in any sense.
.... More
Lastly, just because a lot of loudmouthed religious people assert lies, it doesn't make Christianity true. It makes it a LOUD lie. I highly recommend that people actually READ the Bible. If you do, you will become an atheist. That's why I'm absolutely clear that Christians don't actually read it, they just hold it up and 'believe' it contains something of value to them. It doesn't. Read it and you'll discover that.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
John Jun 11 2012 at 10:30 AM

You are incorrest. The Council of Nicea never used rounds of VOTES (common misconceptiom). Read your history.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
john Jun 11 2012 at 11:09 AM

Nicea, 325: There were 320 bishops, and they confirmed or denied that JC was "Begotten", and was not "created" by god, as was believed by followers of Arius of Alexandria. 318 confirmed, 2 did not. If you call that a vote, fine, but it changed nothing, and was not relative to what would or would not be included in the cannon.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
noteman May 29 2011 at 1:33 PM
Prof. Ehrmann has already dealt with this issue (the voting at the Council of Nicea) and many other elements of early Christian history in his other books (there are about 10 of them), some of which include texts that did not make it past the voting into the New Testament, and others which analyze the changing view of Jesus and notion of "end times" and what effect that had. Paul evidently believed that most people living in his day would still be alive at Christ's return. A century or so later,
.... More
when Revelation was written, that all had to be reconsidered and reinterpreted. The problem with many readings of the Bible (both Hebrew and Greek scriptures) by people who don't know about these things is that the overlook the fact that different ways of understand God as represented from Genesis to Revelation covers well over 1000 years of human history and MANY changes in the way these ideas are received and interpreted.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest May 22 2011 at 9:28 AM

Long Greek sentences vs. short one? Pretty flimsy and biased. I come from a family of Bible scholars (with Doctorates), and this story really misrepresents the Bible. Almost always, it has to do with people trying to bash Christians or justify their atheism. Blah, blah, blah. Tired of the intolerant attitude toward Christians.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Varuk Salt May 22 2011 at 8:57 AM

...it's a forgery. The entire book is a forgery. It's attributed to a non-existent supernatural entity.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

Pages

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Log in or register to post comments

EDITORS' PICKS

tease painting

line

tease devil's kettle

line

tease calories

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  2. What causes tornadoes?
  3. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  4. Sweden runs out of garbage, forced to import from Norway
  5. 10 false facts most people think are true
  6. 5 mind-bending facts about dreams
  7. A solar-powered plug that sticks to windows and out from the crowd
  8. 20 ways to reuse coffee grounds, tea leaves
  9. Stone Age people may have battled against a zombie apocalypse
  10. 30 things you should never compost or recycle
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor
Responsible drinking highlighted in Diageo's annual report
Diageo, which makes some of the world's most popular alcoholic beverages, details social more...
Celebrating Life Every Day, Everywhere, Responsibly.
Diageo's approach to responsible drinking
As the world’s leading premium drinks company, Diageo is proud of our heritage, our brands, and the more...
Celebrating Life Every Day, Everywhere, Responsibly.
What's your DRINKiQ? Tips for drinking responsibly
At Diageo's DRINKiQ website, you can find facts about alcohol and its effect on the human body more...
Celebrating Life Every Day, Everywhere, Responsibly.
Crown Royal honors hometown heroes
The whisky brand calls for nominations of inspiring individuals all over the country for 'Your more...
Celebrating Life Every Day, Everywhere, Responsibly.
CÎROC celebrates Safe Rides with commercial contest
The vodka brand teams up with Esquire magazine for a contest that encourages revelers to drink more...
Celebrating Life Every Day, Everywhere, Responsibly.
Follow Diageo on Twitter

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS