Lawsuit takes aim at Christo's 'Over the River' project

Environmental group Rags Over the Arkansas River alleges that approval of the art project violates federal law.

By

John Platt

Mon, Feb 06 2012 at 9:23 AM

Related Topics:

Eco-art, Art & Architecture

Photo: Adamsphotos/Flickr

Twenty years after artist Christo and his late wife first announced plans to drape the Arkansas River in Colorado with 5.9 miles of fabric, the project — which was finally approved by federal regulators in November — has hit one more snag: a lawsuit from an environmental group that has long opposed it.

The group, Rags Over the Arkansas River (ROAR), filed a lawsuit last week to block Christo's "Over the River" project, alleging the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which approved the project, violated federal law in the process.

The suit was filed with the assistance of a University of Denver professor and two law students. "We are planning to vanquish the giant with the help of these great lawyers from the University of Denver," spokesperson Joan Anzelmo told the press on Feb. 1.

According to the New York Times, the lawsuit accuses the BLM of not properly addressing the project's impact on wildlife, including bighorn sheep, and of inappropriately classifying "Over the River" as a "recreational activity."

Christo's lawyer, meanwhile, told MSNBC that the art project "will withstand legal scrutiny."

But Michael Harris, head of the University of Denver's environmental law clinic, says the project's environmental impact must be taken into account. "For two years they're going to be in this canyon land, drilling holes, 9,100 holes, sometimes 30 feet deep to place anchors to hold all this in place," he said during a press conference outside the Denver federal courthouse.

Meanwhile, hundreds of Colorado locals have been filing into town halls, where construction permits for "Over the River" are being discussed prior to their approval. "God's natural beauty cannot be enhanced," Cañon City resident Marie Vernarsky told Fremont County commissioners on Wednesday, according to the Denver Post.

Even with the opposition, Christo told the Cañon City Daily Record he feels the Freemont County public meeting was "very polite, very civilized." He says he feels both stress and relief that his long-planned art installation is nearing its execution.

The "Over the River" art installation is scheduled for two weeks beginning in August 2014. Construction prior to the opening will last more than a year.

Environmentalists have long opposed "Over the River," arguing that the potential harm it would pose to area wildlife significantly outweighs the artistic benefits. But it has been strongly supported by government officials, who believe it could generate $120 million in tourism and construction revenues for economically depressed Colorado.

While discussions continue and the lawsuit moves forward, Christo is on his way to Abu Dhabi for another art project called "The Mastaba," which he has been planning since 1977. "It's a structure of 410,000 oil barrels," he told the Daily Record. "It is bigger than the pyramid of Cheops and Giza. Five-hundred feet tall, 1,000 feet by 750 feet of 410,000 oil barrels of marvelous colors, brilliant colors in the oasis about 120 miles from city of Abu Dhabi."

Also on MNN:

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 5

Guest Feb 04 2013 at 1:24 AM

your information is all wrong. I have been a boatman on the Arkansas River since 1982. Before this effort, the railroad killed more bighorn sheep than can be documented. Also, highway 50 is responsible for deaths of sheep as well. The bighorn sheep continue to thrive in such a capacity that there hunting licenses for them. The same people who oppose this project said the same things about river raft trips. Yet, I float by sheep at the rivers edge weekly. Let the people of the canyon make some

.... More

money. If you are truly concerned about the environment; stop fracking and the rape of our wildernesses by big oil companies.

Log in or register to post comments
Report This Post

Gearloose May 19 2012 at 1:33 PM

OTR entails drilling 9000 six inch diameter holes up to 30ft deep along the rocky banks of the Arkansas River. No matter how hard they try to cover these up, many will remain visible for centuries if not millenia. This dumb project should have been stopped long ago.

Log in or register to post comments
Report This Post

Guest Feb 04 2013 at 1:45 AM

I would bet you have never been to the Arkansas river before. Highway 50 through the canyon is constantly plagued with falling rocks. The highway department is constantly blasting rocks and putting in anchors in the cliffs above the river. This is not a hiking area it is a river with a highway running through it. Over my 30 years of rafting this canyon commercially, I can not count the number of cars and trucks that have crashed into the river creating much more hazardous waste than a few bolts

.... More

in rocks you will never see. However, like the Riffle Gap site, tourists will flock to see this sight long after the art is taken down in order to feel like they were a part of it. Gearloose, I challenge you to hike the very places you are concerned about. It will take you a lifetime. Only wildlife goes there. This is not a pristine river basin; HELLO, HIGHWAY ON ONE SIDE RAILROAD ON THE OTHER. P.S. the corn you ate the last time will also be visible for centuries. I just hope the kernels of corn you leave behind don't stink as much as your opinion. If you do find yourself hiking on the sheer cliffs on the Arkansas River, You might need those anchors to save your life.