Save humanity or end it? Scholars, authors debate our future
Everything from climate change to world-altering technologies that could affect evolution are under discussion at the roundtable.
Thu, Sep 12 2013 at 3:10 PM
Technology has the potential to end humanity, or to save it. Which will it be?
A group of scientists, humanists and science-fiction authors debated the longevity of the human civilization at a free public symposium on Sept. 12 at the Library of Congress's John W. Kluge Center in Washington, D.C.
"We’ve reached the stage in Earth’s evolution where humans are now a major agent of planetary change," David Grinspoon, the chair of astrobiology at the Kluge Center, said in a statement. "Will these abilities threaten our survival as a species, or even threaten the Earth as a whole, or will we come to live comfortably with these new powers and use them to avoid, rather than hasten, disaster?" said Grinspoon, who will lead the day's talks.
The event kicked off with introductory remarks by Mary Voytek, senior scientist for astrobiology at NASA, and Carolyn Brown, director of the Office of Scholarly Programs at the Library of Congress. [Super-Intelligent Machines: 7 Robotic Futures]
The first panel discussion addressed what remains of nature and how humanity can save it. Environmental journalist David Biello chatyrf with materials scientist Odile Madden of the Smithsonian's Museum Conservation Institute and paleoanthropologist Rick Potts of the National Museum of Natural History.
Sci-fi author Kim Stanley Robinson explored the future in the literary and scientific imagination, with English professor Ursula Heise of UCLA and astronomer and science historian Steven Dick, the 2014 NASA/Library of Congress chair of astrobiology.
In the afternoon, scientists and sci-fi authors addressed world-altering technologies that could affect climate or biological evolution, or prevent future disasters. Astronomer Seth Shostak of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institutein Mountain View, Calif., sat down with science writer and New York Times blogger Andrew Revkin, atmospheric scientist Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science and planetary climatologist Jacob Haqq-Misra of the virtual research Institute Blue Marble Space, to muse about whether humans can form a healthy, long-term relationship with technology and the biosphere.
A concluding discussion with all the panelists and the audience will wrap up the day's events.
Follow Tanya Lewis on Twitter and Google+. Follow us @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on LiveScience.
Related on LiveScience and MNN:
You might also like: