Talking with Lucy Lawless
Best-known for her role as Xena in Xena: Warrior Princess, Lawless is also involved in a number of different charities.
Photo: Sign On 
Welcome to our series Talking to a Famous Person. In this series we publish our conversations with high-profile nonprofit founders, actors and everyone in between. Comments
Lableing those who are skeptical of AGW as sociopaths is a rather regrettable statement from someone whose claim to fame is pretending to be someone she is not, while repeating lines someone else has written for her to memorize.
cheap lacoste polo shirts
cheap lacoste polos
Lucy é realmente maravilhosa, adoro seu trabalho como xena e agora como Lucretia.Estou aqui no Brasil, mas ligada em todas as novidades de lucy e Renee.Adoraria conhece-las pessoalmente!!Adoro as duas Beijos pra vcs, eu as amo!!!
Xena provides more ammunition to the theory that BEAUTY + BRAINS = A CONSTANT.
Projection at its best. I think she is trying to set herself up for the Crissy character in a new Three's Company movie.
Insult someone's religion, and they will get nasty.
Science is best done dispassionately, letting reproduceable data lead you to prove or disprove theories (aka... check my work!)
That hasn't happened with the Warmist Socialists, who saw their theories as a way to "change/control society" (the height of educated arrogance), and ignored, hid, and discredited data that showed otherwise.
She should talk.. hawking around in NZ with a nelly scientist who wont answer FOI requests as to why he selectively changed temperature stations that created hockey stick trends on graphs? He was sacked for proposing NZ reduce its population by 75%.. Don't you just love the Nazi lover Xena.
and grozzwacked washes up on the beach.
Tell me, Whacked, have YOU read all the new research coming out? It seems rather doubtful.
1. AGW alarmist makes or endorses insane predictions of imminent, terrible catastrophe.
2. Predictions fail to occur, even in part.
3. Questions naturally arise about why the predictions failed to occur.
4. AGW alarmists who made or endorsed the insane predictions smear questioners as "deniers" and "sociopaths" without answering the questions.
5. Questioner's skepticism increases.
6. Repeat.
Another vapid celebrity who has allowed herself to be convinced that her celebrity status has somehow endowed her with knowledge, and her opinions with weight.
Next.
The question was: "What would you say to disbelievers to get them to change their minds?" It had absolutely nothing to do with the "people running climate change denial campaigns", which Lawson chose to attack as "sociopaths".
What the questioner was looking for were the usual AGW/CC talking points like "glaciers and ice caps melting, oceans rising, more heat waves, fires, droughts, floods, hurricanes, snowstorms, unpredictable weather, etc. etc. So instead, she chose to not answer.... More
I'd like to know Lawless' science background. Ad hominem attacks are generally not the best way to get your point across. That quote was absolutely moronic.
Which deniers:
The ones, like myself, who acknowledge that the planet is coming out of the Little Ice Age of the 1600s and is warming without the man's intervention
or
The deniers like Michael Mann, whose now discreditted "hockey stick" denied the existense of the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Warm Period. He and the pre Climategate "climate scientists" wanted us to believe that the Earth's temperature was essentiall constant until 1900 when it went on the warming trend.... More
Lucy, if your intelligence matched your looks you would be an exceptional person. Unfortunately, my advice to you is "Don't give up the day job".
And don't make scathing comments about others without at least taking some time to understand their point of view. People who do that are ignorant and prejudiced fools.
But I do like you, honest!
XXX
This is obviously the latest plan of attack on "so called" climate deniers, using celebs who have no concept of the world outside their "darling luvvy" bubbles to spout unproven propaganda, this is also happening in the U,K & any celeb that doesnt conform to this new religion or speaks against it tend to find their workload dry up overnight,
it seems like free speech is being stifled by the powers that be to enforce their intentions which have nothing to do with climate whatsoever,
You are beautiful,but you are definitely missing a lot of knowledge if you believe in "Global Warming",you aren't the smartest person in the world if you believe the Al Gore LIES.
So yet another entertainer is attempting to save team green from humilation while climategate brings down what's left of this worldwide hoax? Those wishing to fight against this type of propaganda from the left are invited to join The Climategate Country Club. A networking site for skeptics who are preparing to fight back:
http://www.climategatecountryclub.com
Sorry Lucy but like so many "Celebs" you can't see the wood for the trees.
CO2 is not a poison. Nor a pollutant. Without it, we die. A little more in the atmosphere is GOOD, trees/plants grow more vigorously. We get more oxygen in return. More CO2 means more food. It does not not mean Al Goricized climate catastrophe. Carry on acting, leave the planet in the hands of Mother Nature, who after all has managed well for about 4.5 billion years. Oh and thank the Sun instead of bleating Green.... More
Lucy has broken the heart of this 'sociopath.'
Lucy, you are extremely tallented, don't spoil it by making such ignorant comments.
"many of the so called sociopathic deniers are extremely kind, well-educated scientists"
"skeptics may be sincere, care deeply, and have studied the issue in greater depth than she assumes"
Clearly not most of the deniers that Lucy has stirred up here. The level or arguments range from:
"Global Warming is so debunked they changed the name to "climate change."
"spouting like a whale."
"Washed up actress"
"the criminals who are running the global warming.... More
Global Warming is so debunked they changed the name to "climate change." Why do you think the NON-sociopaths did that.
nuff said
But the research coming out the past few years is punching serious holes in the Fraud known as AGW/
Perhaps you should READ some of the new research before spouting like a whale.
There are SO many good websites out there. Below is a discussion that speaks to the facts and not about the players. It's easy to understand. Try this one for starters.
http://www.climategate.com/anthropogenic-global-warming-or-just-natural-...
climategate.com is now offline. So much data is out there he didn't get hits.
I'm sorry to read Ms. Lawless's comments regarding AGW skeptics. Clearly, she has been misinformed on the science and the nature of the controversy. Here is an excellent Australian site that might hold her interest long enough to discover that many of the so called sociopathic deniers are extremely kind, well-educated scientists.
In fact, more qualified
It seems Lucy Lawless needs look into the so-called science behind AGW and she will learning nothing is adding up, instead of parroting her AGW lines from her writer(s). Majority of the people are sceptical of AWG, I guess they all are "sociopaths" according to Lucy Lawless. I wish these Hollyweird people would look at the science first before jumping onto a bandwagon.
As much as I enjoy the acting, I am dismayed at her obvious lack of information regarding skeptics and the nature of the AGW social movement.
Lableing those who are skeptical of AGW as sociopaths is a rather regrettable statement from someone whose claim to fame is pretending to be someone she is not, while repeating lines someone else has written for her to memorize.
Perhaps Ms. Lawless would be better off practicing one of the other skills needed in a good actress, namely.... More
"I think the people running climate change denial campaigns are sociopaths"
Well that abut sums my our view of the criminals who are running the global; warming scam.
Lucy, stick to acting, and leave scientific inquiry to those of us who are scientists.
"I think the people running climate change denial campaigns are sociopaths. They don't want you to get off the grid in any sense because then you'd be autonomous and they couldn't make you buy their poison."
Interesting to see how stereotyping affects the intellect.
