Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Saturday, May 25, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Lifestyle › Natural Beauty & Fashion
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
What's the most eco-friendly form of wool?
PETA feels that no wool-wearing is best, but if cozy wool sweaters are your winter must-have, your first green step is to avoid Australian merino wool.

By

PlentyMag.com
Sun, May 03 2009 at 6:17 PM
 10

Related Topics:

Eco-fashion

SNUGGLE UP: Get toasty in the cold months without Australian merino wool. (Photo: mararie/Flickr)

Q. Despite the fact that today’s economy is totally un-purchase-friendly, it’s that time of year when all I want to do is buy cozy, soft, wooly things and curl up with a book to wait out winter. Are there any types of wools that are more sustainable or animal-friendly than others? – Lynn, CT
 
A. Unfortunately, one of the most common types of wool is also the one you really want to avoid: Australian merino wool. Before we get into the why of it all, you’ll want to set down any snack or food item you might happen to be eating.  
 
Ready? Okay, one of the reasons PETA is vehemently anti-wool is a gruesome wool shearing technique called mulesing. It’s a hide-trimming technique (we’ll ease you into this with euphemisms) that came into practice in Australia when farmers realized that cutting excess flesh from their animas’ loose hides nearly eliminated the risk of flystrike—an illness that results when flies nest in the folds of an animal’s skin. Matt Prescott, PETA head of corporate affairs, put it this way in an email:
 
“The cruelest type of wool is merino wool from Australia, where farmers painfully carve or clip chunks of flesh from lambs’ backsides.”
 
The good news is that mulesing is practiced exclusively in Australia, so it’s possible to avoid wools that came from animals subjected to mulesing. Next time you shop for any wool item, check the label or ask a salesperson where the wool came from. American Eagle Outfitters, Abercrombie & Fitch, Timberland, Aéropostale, and Limited Brands are several retailers that have pledged not to use Australian merino wools until the practice is eliminated. Which is to say that the 99.9% of tween girls nationwide who wear nothing but Abercrombie & Fitch clothes can feel morally superior in their merino wool sweaters (never mind the company’s quasi-pornographic advertisements).
 
You won’t be surprised to learn, however, that PETA wants you to do more than just avoid Australian merino wool. “In wool production worldwide,” says Prescott, “animals are sheared by careless workers who are often paid by volume rather than hour, so work quickly, often resulting in animals suffering painful gashes and cuts.” What are your alternatives? PETA suggests you make the full switch from animal-derived materials to plant-derived fabrics like cotton, cotton flannel, polyester fleece, synthetic shearling, tencel, and polartec (a fleece made from soda bottles). Can you do it? Can you go as vegan as Natalie Portman?
 
Lastly, don’t forget that farmers’ markets often offer hand sheared and died wool yarns. As with most items you’ll find at any farmers’ market, you can rest assured that these have come from healthy, happy animals that were given much more TLC (and space to roam) than your average sheep.
 
Story by Tobin Hack. This article originally appeared in Plenty in December 2008.
 
Copyright Environ Press 2008

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 10
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
amcninja's picture
amcninja Oct 17 2012 at 10:18 AM

It amazes me how people start PETA bashing and completely ignore the actual issue being discussed... animal cruelty. Just because you don't like PETA doesn't mean the issues they raise aren't important.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Robert Moean Mar 13 2010 at 9:58 PM
PETA's not as bad as we think? Think again grasshopper. Let's hear what Ingrid Newkirk, president of PETA has to say on the subject of animal rights shall we? “There’s no rational basis for saying that a human being has special rights. A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. They’re all animals.” “Six million people died in concentration camps, but six billion broiler chickens will die this year in slaughterhouses.” “Humans have grown like a cancer. We're the biggest blight on the face of
.... More
the earth.” “I am not a morose person, but I would rather not be here. I don’t have any reverence for life, only for the entities themselves. I would rather see a blank space where I am. This will sound like fruitcake stuff again but at least I wouldn’t be harming anything.” “I openly hope that it [hoof-and-mouth disease] comes here. It will bring economic harm only for those who profit from giving people heart attacks and giving animals a concentration camp-like existence. It would be good for animals, good for human health and good for the environment.” “I will be the last person to condemn ALF [the Animal Liberation Front].” ALF is a violent domestic terrorist organization that claims to be anti-violent but has terrorized hundreds of people, committed millions of dollars in property damage through arson, sent letter bombs to targets of intimidation, and advocates violence as a means to an end. “Our nonviolent tactics are not as effective. We ask nicely for years and get nothing. Someone makes a threat, and it works.” “The bottom line is that people don't have the right to manipulate or to breed dogs and cats... If people want toys, they should buy inanimate objects. If they want companionship, they should seek it with their own kind.” “Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human manipulation.” “There is no hidden agenda. If anybody wonders about -- what’s this with all these reforms -- you can hear us clearly. Our goal is total animal liberation.” “One day, we would like an end to pet shops and the breeding of animals. [Dogs] would pursue their natural lives in the wild ... they would have full lives, not wasting at home for someone to come home in the evening and pet them and then sit there and watch TV.” “Even if animal tests produced a cure for AIDS, we’d be against it.” “In the end, I think it would be lovely if we stopped this whole notion of pets altogether.”
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Jun 19 2009 at 2:52 PM

I fully support the vegan lifestyle, but who could possibly be as green as Hollywood vegans, who have the option of spending as much as they want on alternative clothing? Not a fair comparison. It'd be nice if animal-friendly sites got a little friendlier with their prices, if possible.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Sally May 06 2009 at 7:38 PM
PETA are pretty irresponsible in the way they operate. To get attention they cry wolf and make everything sound much worse than it is. Eventually it backfires because people get wise and stop listening to them. This is particularly the case when they are so hypocritical that they don't even take good care of the animals that they take in themselves. In the case of sheep in australia PETA are running a campaign that is trying to stop a health procedure that is currently necessary to save the lives
.... More
of millions of sheep annually. It's a dangerous and irresponsible campaign that will only lead to increased suffering and risk for sheep unless they get more responsible about it. All farmers face challenges to protect their animals from injury sickness and disease. In Australia we have to protect our sheep from flystrike. We have major breeding programmes under way to breed natural resistance in sheep, in the meantime, where-ever it is still needed, there have also been major improvements to the procedure to make it minimal and humane with the use of wound anaesthetics and antiseptics. Sheep farmers are pouring millions of dollars into constant welfare enhancements to protect our sheep humanely. PETA should help us address this health risk for our sheep responsibly. They should also take much better care of the health and welfare of the animals that they take in. They should treat them with love, food shealter and medicines - instead of going the simple cheap option of just putting them all down. We all know they have more than enough money for this.If you want to help sheep in australia, you should buy australian wool because it is money from the sale of wool that funds the responsible health and welfare programmes that are helping us to address this serious fly strike health risk for sheep in the safest most scientifically responsible and ethical manner available. If you want to help stray animals - write to PETA and tell them to stop killing them all and lspend their money looking after them better.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest Sep 21 2009 at 2:13 AM

I guess PETA would rather see thousands of sheep painfully suffer and die from millions of insects instead of finding a better alternative

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
TheConsumerJournal May 06 2009 at 2:13 PM

...a wild wool, named Paihamu, a foraging rodent, able to kill a lawn in a single's night of consumption, here's more details about this truly eco-wool
,http://alertsforconsumers.com/2009/01/29/ecofashion-or-greenwashing.aspx

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Guest May 06 2009 at 9:29 AM
Hey everyone, I saw the article about going green and being more eco friendly which is great. Lots more people are seeing that Mother Nature really needs our help. I think with global warming creeping up on us, I think it is very important that we become more aware of trying to lower our carbon emissions, and try and do right by the planet. I think we can all do our little bit extra to try and help! At home I always shut the computer down rather than putting it to sleep, and always turn off electrics
.... More
rather than leave them on stand by. These tips may seem small, but if everyone pulled together then I think we could really make a difference to the world. Another hint I have is that I now use e-Cards rather than buying paper cards. Not only are you saving money if you choose a free site, but more importantly, you are helping the environment by saving paper, and therefore less trees need to be chopped down! I have done my research and finally found the best free Environmentally Friendly e-Card site. It is really easy to use, which is great if like me you are not very good with computers! I really like this particular site as there is just so much choice. I know e-Cards are not for everyone but think of the environment it really is a great way to help out and do your bit!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Animal Advocate May 06 2009 at 5:11 AM
PETA ends up killing 95% of the animals they take in because they take in the sickest of the sick, the most injured, etc. They kindly euthanize them as would ANY other shelter or vet. They are not in the "shelter" business, but will help out folks who have no other resources. The two PETA employees did wrong. PETA admits that and was not happy with it, either, though they did help them out legally. Your stance is clear when you say you care about animal WELFARE as opposed to animal RIGHTS which
.... More
would mean they have a right to their own life lived with minimal or no human interference. PETA admits that domesticated animals now depend on humans and will likely need us for a long time to come. PETA advocates no "use" of animals because it feels humans consistently and perpetually misuse and abuse animals, 99% of which is true. Yes, there are good animal guardians. Yes, there are better ways to treat animals and worse ways. BUT, to dismiss PETA as a horrible organization is misjudging it entirely. They have been one of the most successful organizations in the world for changing how animals are treated for the better. Their outrageous antics help to draw attention to the plight of animals under human control. If you think you can do more or better, please feel free to step up and create the organization!
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Geraldine Clarke May 04 2009 at 10:59 PM
The production of cotton for the world market requires enormous amounts of synthetic fertilizers and water so cotton (except for very expensive "boutique" organics and only those organics grown in the few areas with adequate rainfall) is not a terribly green and sustainable agricultural product. The polyesters and other synthetics that PETA recommends are derived from petroleum products and are even worse for the environment. Well-produced wools are a great green product. I've raised sheep and
.... More
other fiber-producing animals in the past; it's not hard to give them a very happy life and, despite PETA's propaganda, almost all livestock producers I've known, and I've known many, do just that. (BTW, flystrike causes terribly painful deaths which sheep must be protected from. Mulesing is not done in the U.S. as the previous person noted and there is also much work being done in Australia to breed Merino sheep without the very loose skin so this problem will eventually disappear.) It is no secret that PETA wants to discourage ALL use of animals, no matter how tenderly raised, a fact that they don't come clean about in their publicity campaigns. According to reports that they must file with the state, they kill over 95% of the animals that come into their shelter. Last year they found homes for a total of eight animals from over 1200 taken in. PETA employess have been arrested for taking animals, promising that PETA will find them "good homes", and then killed them in the PETA van before they even left town and threw their bodies into a store's dumpster. If you want to see what Ingrid Newkirk and her PETA "animal rights" cohorts are really planning long-range, check out this list of verified quotes: http://www.naiaonline.org/articles/archives/animalrightsquote.htm It's a looooong way from the animal welfare principles we all support.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
india May 04 2009 at 8:47 PM
not all merinos are mulesed! ours aren't and we look after them by regularly crutching [trimming] wool that might get mucky. sheep have been selectively bred by humans for over 4000 years so that they MUST now be shorn, otherwise they'll die - wool would get too heavy and preclude walking. well managed sheep on properly managed pasture assist in carbon sequestration...by converting carbon in grass to carbon in protein [meat and wool]. and no, i don't eat them. fear-mongering by spreading misinformation
.... More
is not a practical way to solve the world's problems...
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Log in or register to post comments

EDITORS' PICKS

tease weird things

line

tease cellars

line

tease fishing

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. Student science experiment finds plants won't grow near Wi-Fi router
  2. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  3. How to get a second crop of tomatoes -- for free
  4. Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
  5. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  6. Bras don't actually work, says French study
  7. 10 false facts most people think are true
  8. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  9. What is the 'Monsanto Protection Act'?
  10. 5 mind-bending facts about dreams
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS