Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Sunday, May 19, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Lifestyle › Recycling
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
What does 'biodegradable' mean?
'Biodegradable' doesn't mean what most people think it means, according to a new study.

By

Rodale News
Thu, Dec 08 2011 at 12:56 PM
 6

Related Topics:

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Composting
a sun chips bag and banana peel in a compost pile

Photo: cogdogblog/Flickr

We all want to leave a lighter mark on the planet, so when we see products advertised as "biodegradable," it's natural to assume they're a greener choice. After all, who wouldn't want a product to degrade back into the planet from which it came? But thanks to the garbage collection system in the U.S., in which 55 percent of all our garbage winds up in landfills, "biodegradable" could actually be a bad thing, according to a new study in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.
 
The details
As things like food waste, yard clippings, paper and other purportedly "biodegradable" goods break down in oxygen-deprived landfills, they release two potent greenhouse gases: methane and carbon dioxide. While the carbon dioxide doesn't escape (it usually stays underground and is stored in the landfill), methane escapes into the atmosphere, exacerbating global warming. In fact, landfills are the third-largest source of man-made methane emissions in the U.S.
 
A third of the garbage we toss goes to landfills that collect that methane and convert it to energy, and the authors wanted to know whether the garbage in those landfills was degrading slowly enough for the gas to be converted to energy, mitigating its global warming effects, says James W. Levis, a PhD candidate in the department of civil, construction and environmental engineering at North Carolina State University. "And what our study shows is, no," he says.
 
Using computer modeling, the researchers studied how various materials would decompose under different landfill conditions. Specifically, they looked at food waste, standard solid waste, newsprint, office paper and a new biodegradable plastic polymer called PHBO that's usually created from plant sugars or starches (this type of plastic is different from corn-based plastics and is made by Proctor & Gamble, which provided funding for the study) to see how much methane gas each generated as it decomposed.
 
In the average landfill, biodegradable plastic generated the most methane, followed by office paper, food waste, newspaper and other forms of solid waste. Collection efficiencies for all the methane produced (the amount of methane collected that was converted into usable energy) didn't exceed 57 percent. Because the items decomposed at different rates — food waste degrades faster than biodegradable plastics, which degrade faster than office paper and newsprint — they released methane at different rates and times making it difficult to capture all the methane.
 
What it means
The word "biodegradable" may sound eco-friendly, but the fact that some products release greenhouse gases if they decompose in a landfill could make it a bad thing. "If something just sat in a landfill and never degraded at all, that would be optimal from a greenhouse-gas standpoint," says Levis. Some landfills attempt to collect the methane that's released, but it's easier said than done. "It takes a couple of years to get gas collection," Levis says. It can take 16 years before the systems collect all the gas that's being generated.
 
"You could use the results of this study as a good argument for growing composting infrastructure," Levis adds. In compost heaps, where lots of oxygen is present, food waste, paper and even biodegradable plastics don't generate methane. Yet very few cities offer municipal composting. "And there are lots of greenhouse-gas benefits to recycling," he adds.
 
The bottom line
Don't buy into the biodegradable hype. "The Federal Trade Commission's definition of what's biodegradable is very vague," he says. So while some biodegradable products may be ideal for the oxygen-deprived conditions of a landfill, where they degrade slowly enough for methane gas collection systems to convert them to energy, others aren't — and there's no way for a consumer to know the difference.
 
The best solution is to look at your own personal waste-disposal habits, and reducing, reusing and recycling before opting for supposedly green biodegradable items. And if your city doesn't offer municipal composting, start a compost pile in your back yard. Let oxygen and healthy bacteria convert your food scraps and yard waste into nutrient-rich fertilizer that you can spread on your lawn. And if you do wind up with biodegradable plastics, Levis says you can cut them up into strips before adding them to your pile so they decompose faster.
 
Story by Emily Main. This article is reprinted with permission from Rodale.com.

 

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Comments: 6
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:
anonymous
Guest Jan 12 2013 at 12:08 PM

This website is great. I like it.(www.linkspirit.net)N_X_D_S.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Symphony Dec 15 2011 at 4:36 AM
There seems to be a confusion on what biodegradable plastics are and what they do in the environment. There are two very different types: Oxo-biodegradable (because it degrades by oxidation) is almost exactly the same as conventional plastic, but it converts itself at the end of its useful life in the presence of oxygen into a biodegradable material. It is made with the same raw materials, machines and workforce as ordinary plastic, and it does not cause any loss of jobs. There is no difference
.... More
in strength or durability during its useful life. It can be recycled http://www.biodeg.org/position-papers/recycling/?domain=biodeg.org and it is available worldwide, in unlimited quantities at very little extra cost. Hydro-biodegradable (compostable) plastics attracted public attention about ten years ago because they are made wholly or partly from vegetable resources such as corn starch, and were thought to be “renewable.” However, they cannot be recycled with ordinary plastic, and they are not really “renewable” because large amounts of fossil-fuels are burned and CO2 emitted in the production process. See http://www.biodeg.org/files/uploaded/biodeg/Hydro-biodegradable_Plastic_... In June 2009 Germany’s Institute for Energy and Environmental Research concluded that compostable plastics have a worse Life-cycle Analysis than oil-based plastics. The British Government published a similar study in 2011 which came to the same conclusion. It is correct that compostable plastic can emit methane (a greenhouse gas 23 times more powerful than CO2) in anaerobic conditions in landfill. Oxo-biodegradable plastic will fragment in the upper layers and will save some space, but will not degrade in anaerobic conditions.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
SJG Dec 12 2011 at 11:08 PM

Like! I like the concluding paragraph the most. It was an informative article, but it all comes down to the people and everyday habits. It's up to us humans to make conscious and selfless decisions for the rest of the planet and future generations.

|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
drrossh's picture
drrossh Dec 10 2011 at 7:46 PM
As usual nothing in life is that simple. Biodegradable does not mean compostable. Many materials will biodegrade in a compost facility but many will not. This should be well understood. Compostable material will NOT biodegrade in a landfill. It persits there like a conventional plastic. In a compost facility, when matter biodegrades it is converted to CO2. Any energy that was contained in the matter is therefore lost. In a landfill, when matter biodegrades, it produces methane. This allows
.... More
us to harness the energy out of the methane as we combust it and convert it to CO2. A problem here is we can't capture all the methane. So some escapes to the atm to do more damage than the CO2. However methane is a very clean fuel and when it is burned for energy it is replacing other energy sources, perhaps coal which releases a lot of C02 to the atm, so the net effect on the atm has to look at both factors. On just the environmental side, when a plastic item is disposed it will last many 100's of years. Is that the legacy we want to leave to the future generations? We should not be leaving our problems for them. So from that point of view, we should do all we can to eliminate plastic waste. So reduce, then reuse then recycle, but then rejuvenate. This is a phrase we coined earlier. The rejuvenate is to make products biodegradable so that after reduce, reuse and recycle have been exhausted, then discard to a landfill or compost facility (if there is one around) and let the product biodegrade away. Hence considering these arguments, making items having the ability to biodegrade is preferable. Call it a backstop feature. Build it into plastic products at the time of manufacture. Try to do the reduce, reuse and recycle first, then if those don't work let the product biodegrade away and return to the earth. A complication on this is there compostable plastics are not recyclable, nor are oxo degradable plastics. Many of these manufacturers will lead you to think they are but they are producing non recyclable products. They have to go to compost piles or landfills. Compostable plastic will not biodegrade in a landfill. Oxodegradable plastics will not biodegrade at all. See www.plasticwastesolutions.com for more on this.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
Organics Diversion Dec 08 2011 at 5:52 PM
While there are some good points to this article, and the study it mentions, the overall message is misguided. Yes, organic waste breaks down in the landfill and produces methane and carbon dioxide. We should divert these materials from disposal and send them to composting facilities, as over 100 communities in the U.S. currently do. Compostable products are designed to help facilitate the diversion of these organic wastes from disposal. The report compares the effects of biodegradable plastic
.... More
to conventional plastics in landfills, noting that conventional plastic break down slower, and therefore release fewer emissions. What's the point of that comparison? Ask Procter and Gamble, who funded the study. We should focus our energies on how to recycle those plastics, and how to recycle those organic wastes (perhaps with the help of compostable plastics), not debating how to manage materials in landfills (aka, the dump).
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 
anonymous
James Levis Dec 09 2011 at 3:01 PM
Organics Diversion, I am the co-author of this study that was quoted in the article. The point of the study was to analyze the global warming impacts associated with disposing of biodegradable materials in landfills. The large majority of these materials are being disposed in landfills and there is value in understanding the consequences of that disposal. Proctor and Gamble is interested in knowing the life-cycle emissions and impacts associated with their products, and final disposal is a key part
.... More
of any product life-cycle. Nothing in this research argues against diverting materials from landfills. This research is about understanding what happens to materials once they are in landfills. How can we solve a problem if we don't take the time to understand it? I also want to mention that there is a significant difference between a modern sanitary landfill and an open dump. Sanitary landfills are highly engineering systems meant to minimize the environmental impacts associated with waste disposal. There is still work to be done to understand and reduce those environmental impacts, but that cannot happen without research into what those impacts are.
|
  • Log in or register to post comments
  • Report This Post 

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Log in or register to post comments

EDITORS' PICKS

tease kids in woods

line

tease stargazing

line

tease hand

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 15 famous people who mysteriously disappeared
  2. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  3. 8 hair care treatments you can make yourself
  4. 15 houseplants to improve indoor air quality
  5. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  6. Stone Age people may have battled against a zombie apocalypse
  7. Jon Stewart explains the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’
  8. How to clean brass naturally
  9. 10 false facts most people think are true
  10. 12 cool urban bicycles ready to replace your car
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS