Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Wednesday, May 22, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

MNN.COM › Lifestyle › Responsible Living
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
Small diversions can double mistakes
Tiny distractions such as focusing on sudden movement and getting phone calls, can disrupt your train of thought and make you worse at completing a task.

By

Tia Ghose, LiveScience
Tue, Jan 22 2013 at 5:25 PM

Related Topics:

Healthy Living

Photo: Shutterstock.com

Don't look down! Checking your phone may take just a few seconds, but that's enough to ruin your train of thought, according to new research showing that a three-second distraction can double the number of mistakes people make.
 
Given how commonly such distractions occur in modern life, the findings, published Jan. 7 in the Journal of Experimental Psychology, could have broad implications for how people work.
 
Multitasking myth
Past studies have shown that switching between many different tasks makes people worse at all of them. But those studies typically looked at longer distractions, said study co-author Erik Altmann, a psychologist at Michigan State University.
 
"We wanted to examine the kind of situation where someone is deep in thought and the phone rings," Altmann said. "After the phone call, you have to sit there and try to figure out where you left off in the task."
 
To test these situations, Altmann asked 300 undergraduates to complete a computerized task that involved a series of steps.
 
Students were shown a group of characters in different colors and formatting, and then asked to do several steps in order, such as picking out all the vowels, then all the red-colored letters, then all the even numbers, and so on.
 
Some of the time, the students could complete the task uninterrupted, but occasionally the computer screen would randomly display two letters and ask the students to type in those letters. Once the participants had done so, they went back to their tasks.
 
"It was meant to capture something like what you're doing when you're doing your taxes, because it's important to do the steps in the right sequence."
 
Though the distractions took only three seconds and weren't difficult tasks, students lost their places or made mistakes twice as often after those distractions as they did without interruptions.
 
Attention grabber
The distractions were so brief that they couldn't have caused people to actually forget the tasks they were doing, losing them from short-term memory. Rather, Altmann hypothesizes that the demands of switching attention, no matter how briefly, take mental energy that would otherwise have gone toward the task.
 
That has implications for productivity in the workplace, where short distractions such as email alerts and phone calls are ubiquitous, he said. These brief distractions may also affect how "present" people are in social situations, he said.
 
"When people are stealing glances at their cellphones, they're not quite with you in the same way as when they're looking you in the eye," he said.
 
 
Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience. We're also on Facebook & Google+. 
 
Related on LiveScience and MNN:
  • 10 Ways to Keep Your Mind Sharp
  • Pay Attention! 5 Tips to Stay Focused
  • 10 Things You Didn't Know About the Brain
  • MNN: Texting while walking: More dangerous than you think
 
This story was originally written for LiveScience and is reprinted with permission here. Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company.

You might also like:

Join the conversation

Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.
Log in or
create an account
  • Sign in using this account:

EDITORS' PICKS

tease snake

line

tease book destinations

line

tease rebound cities

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. Tornado survivor finds dog during live TV interview
  2. 5 of the best-looking cars ever
  3. Why we turn to dogs when disaster strikes
  4. Superfoods: 11 berries to improve your health
  5. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  6. Bride finds self-esteem by taking a diet from her mirror
  7. Mystery cause of Irish potato famine finally solved
  8. Rebounding from adversity: 7 cities that have survived tragedy
  9. 10 false facts most people think are true
  10. Watch: Tornado survivor finds dog during TV interview
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor
CSX 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility Report [video]
One of the nation's leading transportation companies cut greenhouse gas emissions, increased more...
Promise of Tomorrow
CSX gives back with inspirational Boys & Girls Club makeover
Shipping company's 'Beyond Our Rails' stewardship program sponsors a day of more...
Promise of Tomorrow
The story of New York’s High Line (part 1 of 5): A brief history
Trains began chugging through the West Side of Manhattan more than a decade before the start of the more...
Promise of Tomorrow
The story of New York’s High Line (part 2 of 5): The challenges
When CSX acquired 42 percent of the assets of the Conrail in 1998, those assets included 1 1/2 more...
Promise of Tomorrow
The story of New York’s High Line (part 3 of 5): The vision
While it was clear the remnants of the historic High Line couldn’t be used to run trains, what it more...
Promise of Tomorrow

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS