Sediment pollution and Arkansas sand mining

Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality files complaint against a sand mining company due to sediment pollution of a nearby creek.

By Uta Meyer, Local CorrespondentMon, Dec 20 2010 at 8:44 PM EST

DIRTY WATER: High turbidity caused by excessive sediment content dramatically affects water quality. (Photo: eustatic/Flickr)
What is the most common pollutant of river, streams and lakes? Which pollutant causes over $16 billion in damage to the environment? The answer is sediment. Many of us would probably call it "dirt" and not be aware of the impact an above-average amount of sediment can have on overall water quality. 
 
The EPA has established sediment load and turbidity standards for each state. Arkansas's standards focus on specific rivers and regions as well as activities that, if not managed properly, would impact water quality due to increased sediment. For example, turbidity in the Arkansas should not exceed 50 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTUs), while turbidity in bodies of water in the Ozark Highlands cannot exceed 10 NTUs.  Also, the turbidity in rivers, streams or lakes cannot visibly increase due to municipal, industrial, agricultural, waste discharge or in-stream activities. 
 
On Dec. 14, the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) announced its filing of a complaint in Izard County Circuit Court against Bluebird Sand LLC, a sand mining company working in Izard County. The complaint cites a violation of state pollution laws involving one of the company's facilities near Mount Pleasant, Ark. Sediment-heavy water used for the facility's sand-cleaning operations was being allowed to flow into a nearby creek. The sediment pollution ultimately resulted in a fish kill. 
 
Bluebird Sand shut down all operations at the facility until, they say, appropriate equipment can be installed to manage sediment discharge. However, the complaint filed by ADEQ hopes to shut down all operations until the company secures a wastewater discharge permit. ADEQ's complaint also seeks a $250,000 fine. 
 
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.
Previous Post
Invasive plant forces lake drainage
   Next Post
Major bird and fish deaths in Arkansas

Comments

Follow this conversation View:

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use

EDITORS' PICKS

tease to asteroids

tease to pet facials

tease to emotional eating

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT