Feasting on walleye

By Rory Mattson, Local CorrespondentThu, Jul 02 2009 at 1:03 PM EST
 13

Telling a Minnesotan there is more to the months of June through August than road construction and mosquitos is borderline heresy, but for those who can withstand being saturated in bug spray and two-lane highways, I'm here to remind us all of one summer staple that makes it all worth it: walleye.
 
A fish some of you southerners may have never seen on your plate, but a delicacy those familiar with the north woods can attest to. As the state fish of Minnesota, walleye have long been the angler's choice bounty but not without a bit of debate. Over the years, battles between recreational fishermen and commercial netting have colored the fish with controversy. In 2004 Minnesota's Kare11 news team exposed several Twin Cities restaurants serving a knock-off walleye being shipped in from Eastern Europe known as zander.
 
Battles with Native Americans' spear fishing and netting techniques have also stirred up emotion. Currently, tribes are allowed limited opportunities to commercially fish DNR stocked lakes and move their bounty tax free. Having the state essentially pay for walleye production and then allow tax free trade has rubbed several Minnesotans the wrong way.
 
This year the walleye limit was set to four, making it the lowest it's been for years and again stirring up discontent among many hankering for more of their favorite fish fix. The new limit is projected to decrease walleye yields by around 1 percent -- not exactly a conservation effort if you ask me. But walleye supplies have been fairly sustainable as of late. Regulations on size are meant to protect reproductive fish and keep anglers from depleting youthful stocks. These efforts have seemingly been successful and allowed Minnesota to remain the number one walleye consumer in the United States.
 
How does one feast on this famed fish, you ask?
 
Well there are a variety of ways, and depending on whether you're a home consumer or a restaurant goer you'll have some options.
I'll say this to begin: if you're in a Minnesota restaurant that has a lick of state pride, the beer-battered walleye sandwich should be a safe bet. If you're not a fan of the frier, order up a fillet and there's a good chance your dizzied taste buds will wonder when lobster migrated to the land of 10,000 lakes.
 
If you're cooking your fresh catch at home and can't find grandma's famous recipe, don't sweat it. There are hundreds of creative ways to cook up walleye that are only a Google search away. Two approaches I've tried recently for baked walleye and breaded walleye can be found here, or if you want a few more options this Web site has a great list.
 
But however you choose to feast, be thankful that during the three months of the year Minnesotans can walk outside without long johns, walleye give us even more incentive to get outside and enjoy our great environment.
 
Photo credit: Bl@ck Coffee/Flickr
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.
Previous Post
Ash borers are eating through Minnesota's woodlands
   Next Post
Fishing for the environment

Comments

Follow this conversation View:

anonymous
Anonymous 07/09/2009 12:29 PM

If it weren't for Leopold, we may not have a Wilderness Program. Do your research before calling someone an idiot.

anonymous
Anonymous 07/08/2009 22:36 PM

It honestly scares me that some of you can vote. Instead of engaging in a competent discussion, you resort to name calling. Bravo, bravo. You people can't see the forest for the trees, and have absolutely no clue. No clue.

Great article.

anonymous
Anonymous 07/07/2009 03:51 AM

The meat eater who rides a bike as his full time vehicle leaves a bigger carbon footprint than the vegan who drives a Hummer H1 as his full time vehicle.

anonymous
pcoltrane19 07/07/2009 16:33 PM

Catching and eating a fish has essentially no impact on your carbon footprint. However, eating meat, dairy and certain other fruits and vegetables that are not locally sourced has huge impact on one's carbon footprint. In fact switching to a locally sourced diet can reduce the equivalent greenhouse gas emissions of driving 1,000 miles (.... More

anonymous
Anonymous 07/07/2009 03:49 AM

is an integral part to the complex ecosystem in which it lives. By eating walleye you are effecting its environment, our environment, negatively. By effecting the environment negatively, YOU are a naive and ignorant person who should not be writing for an environmental blog.
Also, any justification for eating of animals that you create is just an illogical and irrational excuse to defend your own ignorance.
And don't use the racist Teddy Roosevelt to defend your irrational.... More

anonymous
Anonymous 07/06/2009 19:17 PM

Yum, walley is delicious. Fishing walleye is a great tradition in Minnesota and with proper management (which is one reason we support the DNR), we will be able to enjoy this resource forever. To suggest that one does not support the environment if one consumes fish, is a bit naive. Thanks, also, for the link to the recipes. That's a nice addition to the article.

anonymous
Rory Mattson 07/06/2009 18:55 PM

Hey all, I like the discussion. It seems there are some contradicting opinions as to how fishing and hunting influence the environment. The issues being argued aren't exactly touching on the same subject. That is, some seem to be only considering the micro impact while disregarding the macro. In my own defense, I'll say that I love the environment and that fishing and hunting can indeed promote environmental sustainability. Stay tuned for my next post. It will be how fishing and hunting in.... More

anonymous
Anonymous 07/06/2009 01:57 AM

why are you writing for an environmental blog?

anonymous
Anonymous 07/06/2009 01:56 AM

EATING ANIMALS AND BUYING DUCK STAMPS IS THE LEAST WE CAN DO TO HELP THE ENVIRONMENT!!!!!!!

literally, it is the least anyone could do . . .

anonymous
Anonymous 07/06/2009 01:54 AM

that if it wasn't for great animal killers (sportsmen) such as Teddy Roosevelt, Aldo Leopold, etc, that we wouldn't have such great animals today?!?!? and your title is ignorant?

Nice logic idiot.

anonymous
Anonymous 07/05/2009 21:56 PM

...of people to bash hunting and fishing. License sales and sales tax of hunting/fishing equipment fund most wildlife protection. If it weren't for sportsman such as Teddy Roosevelt, Aldo Leopold, etc. a lot of species wouldn't have made it. If someone really cares about the environment, go buy a duck stamp.

Great article, I love to catch Saugeye....right up there with crappie for table fare.

anonymous
Anonymous 07/05/2009 20:27 PM

I don't think making the most of nature's resources by eating fish is quite as villainous as you've made it sound.

anonymous
Anonymous 07/05/2009 05:24 AM

AND KILL IT AND EAT IT!!!!!!!!!!

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use

EDITORS' PICKS

tease to asteroids

tease to pet facials

tease to emotional eating

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT