Skip to main content

Secondary menu

User menu

  • Join
  • OR
  • Log In

MNN - Mother Nature Network

Wednesday, June 19, 2013
SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • Leaderboard
  • Nest
  • TreeHugger
  • Photos
  • Blogs
  • SB 2013
  • Joy of Less

Search form

Social links

Main menu

  • Earth Matters
    • Browse all »
    • Animals
    • Weather
    • Energy
    • Politics
    • Space
    • Translating Uncle Sam
    • Wilderness & Resources
  • Health
    • Browse all »
    • Allergies
    • Fitness & Well-Being
    • Healthy Spaces
  • Lifestyle
    • Browse all »
    • Arts & Culture
    • Travel
    • Natural Beauty & Fashion
    • Recycling
    • Responsible Living
  • Green Tech
    • Browse all »
    • Computers
    • Gadgets & Electronics
    • Research & Innovations
    • Transportation
  • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Browse all »
    • Green Workplace
    • Personal Finance
    • Sustainable Business Practices
  • Food & Drink
    • Browse all »
    • Beverages
    • Healthy Eating
    • Recipes
  • Your Home
    • Browse all »
    • At Home
    • Organic Farming & Gardening
    • Remodeling & Design
  • Family
    • Browse all »
    • Babies & Pregnancy
    • Family Activities
    • Pets
    • Protection & Safety

Breadcrumb Navigation

Home
    x
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Bookmark and ShareShare
  • Earn Points
    What's this?
New Jersey approves deer contraceptive
New deer contraceptive, costing as much as $1,000 per deer, is widely dismissed as impractical and inefficient.

By:

Daniel Jonathan
Thursday, October 13, 2011 - 19:40

GROWING PROBLEM: A burgeoning deer population causing damage all over the state has officials looking for new solutions, now including a controversial contraception drug. (Photo: nosha/Flickr)

As anybody from New Jersey can tell you, the sight of a deer on the side of the road is a familiar one. Whether it's by eating expensive flowers or crops or scampering onto roadways and causing car accidents, however, a burgeoning deer population is causing New Jersey a lot of expensive problems. Often, local officials organize "hunts" with the clear objective of reducing the deer population. However, even the hunts do not seem to be making a dent in their numbers. It now seems that state officials are ready to embrace other, more controversial methods of reducing the deer population, including ones that would seem to go straight to the source.
 
Just this week, New Jersey became the second state in the nation to approve the use of a new wildlife contraceptive for deer, with the hope that stemming their reproduction will allow the hunts and other methods to prove more effective. However, according to Ryan Hutchins at the Star Ledger, concerns have arisen not just about the controversial nature of the method, but about its practicality. The federally developed GonaCon "is simply too costly and impractical for use outside contained areas. It's not the 'magic bullet' that biologists have been searching for, and it only works in conjunction with other means of population reduction, like a hunt," state officials said.
 
According to those same state officials, the biggest problem with the drug is its combined costs. GonaCon is a single-shot solution with a per-dose cost of $50 (sold by the U.S. Department of Agriculture). However, according to Hutchins, "manpower costs can push that price tag to $1,000 per deer by some estimates."
 
"GonaCon works by limiting an animal's ability to produce sex hormones," says Gail Kern, a spokeswoman with the USDA. It would seem there is a difference of opinion between the federal and state level as to the effectiveness of the drug, as the federal USDA Agency manufactures and promotes it, but yet many state officials, such as Al Ivany, a biologist with New Jersey's Department of Environmental Protection, dismiss it off-hand. "You would have to inoculate the entire deer population of New Jersey."
 
In good times, one might think that this would be a method worth trying out, in conjunction with a hunt. However, the significant inoculation cost per deer seems to make it impractical for the time being. With hundreds of millions of dollars being cut from education, police, firefighter and other budgets across the state, it's easy to say that there are better ways New Jersey should be spending its very limited amount of money.
 
Previous Post
Outdated sewer systems spewing raw sewage into New Jersey waterways
Next Post
New Jersey's Highlands Act saves millions of acres from development

You might also like:

Join the conversation

EDITORS' PICKS

tease BBQ grills

line

tease bees

line

tease road trip

Advertisement

TODAY'S MOST POPULAR ON

  1. 10 uses for Parmesan cheese rinds
  2. 13 natural remedies for the ant invasion
  3. 7 surprising things Pope Francis has done in his first 100 days
  4. 10 false facts most people think are true
  5. Yurts: Everything you ever wanted to know but were afraid to ask
  6. Watch: Sir David Attenborough deals with a band of cannibals the British way
  7. Student science experiment finds plants won't grow near Wi-Fi router
  8. A mother like no other
  9. 9 habits that may do more harm than good
  10. How the rest of the world brushes their teeth
+ Add this to my site

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered
Advertisement
Advertisement

Footer menu

  • Quick Links
    • Joy of Less
    • About Us
    • Advisory Board
    • Editors' Blog
    • Press
    • Privacy
    • Sitemap
    • Terms of Service
  • MNN Tools
    • Advice
    • Blogs
    • Day in History
    • Eco-glossary
    • Infographics
    • Lists
    • Photos
    • Videos
  • Connect
    • The Nest
    • Contact Us
    • Mixed Greens
    • Newsletters
    • RSS
    • Social
    • TreeHugger
    • Mobile
  • Channels
    • Earth Matters
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Green Tech
    • Eco-Biz & Money
    • Your Home
    • Family
    • State Reports
  • Follow MNN
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Google+
    • StumbleUpon

Copyright © 2013 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE

SPONSORS