Food or fuel?

It can be eaten with butter, made into sweetener, or processed to run your car. So what exactly do the experts have to say about using corn as fuel instead of food?

By Jessica Nape, Local CorrespondentMon, Oct 05 2009 at 1:48 PM EST

CONVERTING COBS: Growing gas isn't necessarily cleaner. (Photo: Rostros y Voces/flickr)
In case you haven't yet noticed, I've been on a bit of a corn kick lately. It's a touchy subject ... lots of people depend on making their living by growing corn, and others claim that corn leads us to cleaner, greener ethanol fuel. Furthermore, we also can't deny the fact that corn is found in just about everything -- soda, fruit drinks, hamburger meat, chicken, pork and even shipments of international food aid.
 
So then the question is raised: is corn really all that sustainable? 
 
The honest answer after considering all the shipping, fertilizers, GMOs and water that goes into producing corn and converting it into bio-fuel is that the jury is still out. And it looks like the jury may be out on this question for quite a while.
 
Recently at the 2009 Consumer Issues Conference hosted by the University of Wyoming, I had the privilege of sitting in on a presentation by Dr. Tim Burkink, professor of Marketing and Dean of the College of Business and Technology at the University of Nebraska at Kearney. His topic "Ethanol: Food or Fuel? An analysis of Systems in Conflict" focused on the big picture of ethanol in the United States and questioned whether or not the practice of growing corn to make ethanol is sustainable.
 
Being from Nebraska, the differences in opinions regarding corn production for ethanol became apparent when Dr. Burkink asked for the audience's initial feelings on ethanol. When faced with feedback stating that corn is highly political, largely subsidized and lacks big returns (it takes about four gallons of fossil fuels to produce five gallons of ethanol) it became obvious that Mr. Burkink was, "not in Nebraska anymore."
 
Unlike Nebraska and other mid-western plains states, it is not typical to see an ethanol label on the gas pump while refueling your car or truck in Wyoming. Therefore, people in this state are not sensitized in quite the same way. But despite these facts, Dr. Burkink explained that using corn for ethanol adds value to the product even though the environmental benefits are a bit muddy.  Ethanol is a topic where agriculture and energy converge; the inputs and outputs are numerous. But according to the conclusions of Dr. Burkink, it is absolutely essential to acknowledge that both fossil fuels and bio-fuels are not sustainable and that if we continue down this road, further development and research in biofuel energy and infrastructure is a must.
 
Here are some additional facts about the fuel versus food debate:
  • 25 percent of United States corn production goes towards making ethanol.
  • 97 percent of U.S. ethanol is made from corn.
  • Renewable resource fuels are expected to increase from 9 billion gallons to 36 billion gallons by the year 2022.
  • The country of Brazil is energy independent -- their ethanol is made mostly from sugar cane, a much more efficient raw product for making ethanol.
  • Ethanol is attributed to 3,000 jobs in Nebraska and approximately $3 billion in ethanol infrastructure and farmers' incomes.
  • President Obama has stated that ethanol helps our national security.
 
 
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.
Previous Post
Let's get local
   Next Post
Autumn at the Greenbelt

Comments

Follow this conversation View:

anonymous
ess 10/17/2009 02:58 AM

this argument has mostly died out as far as credibility is concerned, as the environmental cost to produce "green" energy sources from corn-based ethanol are actually worse than investing resources and funds into cleaner-burning oil engines (which i don't agree with... come on, there is no need for oil nor coal in this environment nor economy)... and the nebraska cornhuskers aren't too hot this year either, so... the cornhusker comment was off topic, but i see your point... this is obviously.... More

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use

EDITORS' PICKS

tease to asteroids

tease to pet facials

tease to emotional eating

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT