Greenpeace praises Nokia, slams Nintendo
The group rated 18 major electronics companies on their environmental business practices.
Wed, May 26, 2010 at 05:21 AM
RANKINGS: Nintendo, maker of the Wii, took last place on the list. Greenpeace says it is "the only company that has never engaged in dialogue with Greenpeace" among the big industry players. (Photo: Paul Sakuma/AP)
Greenpeace criticized electronic firms Nintendo and Toshiba for low environmental standards in a report Wednesday while praising Nokia and Sony Ericsson's approach to hazardous substances, recycling and energy use.
In its quarterly "Guide to Greener Electronics," released in Tokyo's Akihabara electronics district, the group rates 18 major electronics companies on progress in phasing out hazardous substances, recycling electronic waste and improving energy efficiency.
It targets elimination of two toxic chemicals in particular — polyvinyl chloride and brominated flame retardants — because they are long-lasting in the environment and can accumulate in human bodies.
Greenpeace researcher Iza Kruszewska said highly toxic dioxins were released by collectors of electronics trash burning PVC cables to recover the copper inside or cooking circuit boards in acid to recover gold.
Nintendo, maker of the Wii console, took bottom place, announced Kruszewska. She added that the gaming giant was "the only company that has never engaged in dialogue with Greenpeace" among the big industry players.
Nintendo declined to comment directly but said that each environmental organization "asks different questions, which tend to be narrow in focus rather than take into account the bigger picture of wider corporate activity."
"We are committed to reporting on our CSR (corporate social responsibility) performance in an open way that avoids misreporting," the Kyoto-based company said in a statement, urging consumers to visit its website for details.
Toshiba, which makes electronic goods as well as nuclear power plants, dropped from third in December to 14th in the latest ranking.
Toshiba earned penalty points "for breaking its promises that all its consumer electronics products should have been free of PVC and BFRs by April 1 this year", said Kruszewska.
"They are hazardous in their production but even more so in the end-of-life (stage), when products containing these substances are recycled in substandard conditions like we see in China, India," she said.
Officials at Toshiba were not immediately available for comment.
Nokia took the top spot and Sony Ericsson came second. Philips was in third, followed by Motorola in fourth and Apple on fifth.
Greenpeace imposed penalty points on Samsung, Dell, Lenovo, LG Electronics and Toshiba for backtracking on promises.
"Samsung is the first company to get a second penalty point because they not only broke their commitment but failed to give a new timeline for eliminating PVC and BFRs in TVs," Kruszewska said.
She noted that eliminating toxic materials from manufacturing was important as flows of electronic waste from rich countries to poorer countries are hard to stop.
"We are seeing more and more products are rolling out which are free of PVCs and BFRs from companies like HP, Acer and also two Indian brands, Wipro and HCL," she said. Wipro and HCL are not covered in the ranking.
"In general, Japanese companies perform best on energy and weakest on e-waste and chemical criteria.
"No Japanese company has launched products completely free of PVC and brominated flame retardants."
Copyright 2010 AFP Global Edition