David All and the dark side of social media
Thu, Nov 19 2009 at 7:52 PM EST
Up until now the realm of social media with its ranks of whistle-blowing bloggers, tweeting political operatives, and sharp-tongued YouTubers has been widely considered the bastion of the digital left. But that is about to change.
David All is in da house.
And by 'house' I mean that thoroughly blue-tinted terrain of Inter-Web 2.0 historically dominated by the liberal likes of Ashton Kutcher, Will.I.am, Arianna Huffington, Norman Lear, Robert Greenwald, and oh, that Black dude who claims to be our president but who is actually a Muslim foreign national.
Who is David All?
Some call him Karl Rove 2.0. Others call him 'Jesus' for the tech-challenged conservative elite. But his website makes his true identity clear: "David All is the Internet. And he believes you are too."
I think David All may be the most dangerous man on the Internet, and I'll tell you why.
He gets social media. His consultancy DAG (David All Group) recently launched a new Web 2.0 platform called act.ivi.st -- a one-stop shop if you are attempting to outfit your local oil or coal lobbyist with a website that looks like a real grassroots organization fighting to stop climate legislation. The site seamlessly integrates Facebook Connect so you don't have to create a new account (a feature which conveniently doubles as a mechanism to background check your registered members).
It has a twitter feed, integrated YouTube video, a comprehensive blog and, most importantly, it has a leaderboard which allows members to score points for doing various activities like watching or sharing a video, connecting via Facebook, reading a post, etc. In other words he makes getting politically involved kind of fun.
The first public display of this social media technology tour de force is a new activity website for the Heritage Foundation, a neo-conservative Washington think tank that has worked for over a decade to derail climate legislation.*
Here's a demo of the new site:
It's no secret that the Heritage Foundation is funded by oil money, coal money, tobacco money, the weapons industry, big pharma. You name it. If they are making a lot of money and have a perceived regulatory threat, they most probably have held a party for the Heritage Foundation.
But that's all well and good. Mega-rich corporations lobbying Capitol Hill ... that's just the way business is done in Washington. Unfortunate, yes. Out of bounds, no. Even their past propaganda stunts are just fine. Everyone expects propaganda.
But the NoEnergyTax.com social media site is doing something different ... it is turning propaganda into a verb. It is post-propaganda, a diabolical post-modern reinvention of propaganda that creates the fictional narrative of "real" people backing a "real" movement, when the reality is probably closer to a few well-paid interns cheerleading for a high-stakes marketing campaign.
Digital pom poms, kids. That's what I'm talking about. And that is what David All is delivering with style.
I don't blame him for wanting to get in on the social media game. They have had a series of ***-whoopins in the past few years. First there was Moveon.org, then Rock the Vote, then those oh-so-inconvenient viral videos by Brave New Films which discredited many a Republican candidate. Then there was VideotheVote (sorry no more AWAL ballot boxes) and lastly, that coup d'etat BarackObama.com which forever redefined how a political campaign could be run (and funded) leveraging social media tools.
But there's a big difference with those online media phenomena and what David All is trying to do with NoEnergyTax.com. The difference is transparency. In all the above cases, these are real organizations stating and then pursuing their political objectives. In the case of the NoEnergyTax, it is smoke and mirrors that facilitates the perpetuation of a lie -- that clean energy legislation will raise taxation on the middle class.
To learn more about astroturfing watch this video with Rachel Maddow. Thanks to Monica Walsh over at Change-Congress.org for the lead.
* To learn more about how the Heritage Foundation has been involved in funding "scientists" to rebuke climate change, I strongly encourage reading the book Climate Cover-up.
Link
EMAIL
Stumble
Tweet
CLOSE
link:
link:
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect
the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions,
MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.
| « Previous Become a Copenhagen ambassador | Next » '3D solar' panel works underground |
Comments(6)
Posted By Vermont Homesteader - Fri, Nov 20 2009 at 1:15 PM ESTYou write....
..."creates the fictional narrative of "real" people backing a "real" movement, when the reality is probably closer to a few well-paid interns cheerleading for a high stakes marketing campaign."
This is why you can't trust social media - no matter the cause. Its just too easy to manufacture "outrage" or a "tsunami" of public opinion. TripAdviser (a site I use) is dealing with a similar problem right now.....the "happy" guests at various hotels actually work at those hotels.
Let's face.... More
Posted By Ron King - Fri, Nov 20 2009 at 1:12 PM ESTIt shouldn't come as a surprise....
...that every side in an argument can figure out social media.
Posted By David All - Fri, Nov 20 2009 at 5:59 AM ESTAgree to disagree
Unfortunate that we disagree on the issues but I'm pleased to see that you spent time understanding the technology. Perhaps we can catch up over coffee and I can work on convincing you.
Posted By Kadi Hardison - Fri, Nov 20 2009 at 1:16 PM ESTwell, if this really is David All, then....
...the first time I've heard heard of you was today.
and at least you have manners.
That's got to count for something.
Posted By David All - Sat, Nov 28 2009 at 9:54 AM ESTYes... it's me.
And I was serious about grabbing a cup of coffee. Email me at david.all AT davidallgroup.com if you're in DC / want to catch up sometime.
David
dimwit
david all should not be underestimated, but he should certainly not be overestimated either. he's certainly not the karl rove 2.0. he just wants to make a buck, not re-align the political landscape. and he's short.