MNN.COM > MNN BLOGGERS > Karl Burkart's Blog

Karl Burkart

Top 7 disappearing glaciers, Part 1

Here for 10,000 years. Gone in 10. Seven examples of how a warming climate is melting the world right before our eyes. A primer on the science..
Thu, Jan 21 2010 at 7:40 PM EST
Read more: CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, SKEPTICISM

Photos: The Matterhorn Then & Now, Getty Images
This week a volcano of controversy erupted over the very icy topic of glaciers with critics attacking the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for including an incorrect reference to the disappearance of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035.
 
Many skeptics claim that this “glacier goof-up” somehow disproves the credibility of the IPCC as a whole and the thousands of scientists it cites in its report. And more significantly they are calling into question the overwhelming accumulation of data that proves that around 90% of the major glaciers in the world are melting... very, very quickly.
 
Here’s a quick reference chart that indexes average Mass Balance (loss or gain) in the cryosphere (glaciated areas) in units of ‘m w.e.’ or mass-water equivalent (i.e. the “volume” of the glacier). Glacier Mass Balance is a rigorous form of analysis that factors in a wide variety of measurements, including surface area.*
 
* units of mass-water equivalent measure the actual quantity of H20 by mass. Solid ice is actually only .9 m w.e. (air bubbles) and snow is significantly. So when you see the units you have to factor in that the actual depth of the glacier is much more than the depth designated in units of m w.e.
 
The chart is from a 2006/2007 report by the World Glacier Monitoring Service, an independent research organization which has been monitoring the world’s glaciers since 1894.
 
And it is very scary.
 
It shows the world divided into 9 quadrants and the average level of change in glacier mass for each. As is quite evident, most of the world’s cryosphere is in a process of deglaciation (red & yellow). Yes people, the world is melting.
 
According to the report, we have lost as much as 20% of the entire mass of glaciers on the planet since WWII. A figure that is almost impossible to comprehend, considering that most of these glaciers have been here for tens of thousands of years with relatively minor fluctuations in mass. It appears that the LIA (“Little Ice Age”) had little impact on the size of the earth's glaciers (an inconvenient truth for climate skeptics).
 
Researchers looking at the relationship between surface area and mass of glaciers dating back to the LIA have this to say:
The observed trend of increasingly negative mass balance over reducing glacier surface areas thus leaves no doubt about the ongoing climatic forcing resulting from the change in climate and possible enhancement mechanisms such as mass balance / altitude feedback, altered turbulent and longwave radiation fluxes due to the size and existence of rock outcrops or changes in the surface albedo (Paul et al. 2007) via UNEP.
 
In English that means that the glaciers are melting at an abnormally rapid speed, and this can only be attributed to global warming combined with environmental feedback loops (for instance.. the reduction of albedo or reflectiveness due to the fact that as glaciers melt, dark rocks are exposes which attracts here and increases melting rates).
 
Click on the link below to see 7 examples of glacial giants that are melting before our eyes.
 
CLOSE link:
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.
« Previous
Himalayan Glacier Goof-up: More fake ammo for the climate denial industry		   Next »
Top 7 disappearing glaciers

Comments(3)

Sort by:
Posted By Dave N - Thu, Jan 28 2010 at 10:11 PM EST

Busted

This is how the Matterhorn looks today:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/4287011379_55b68a7b3c.jpg

Your "comparison" above reaches the kind of misleading or outright lying pinnacle that Al Gore aspires to.

Posted By Casey Verdant - Mon, Jan 25 2010 at 6:54 PM EST

IPCC must clean house

Climate Chief Pachauri has ruined his reputation in the scientific community and the public-at-large by pushing the faulty Himalayan-glacier estimates. If the IPCC is to restore its reputation and become an effective advocate for climate change legislation, they need a new leader and more transparent research reporting mechanisms. Himalayagate cannot happen again.

Interested in climate change, clean energy, or energy efficiency? Go to .... More

Posted By William Holder - Mon, Jan 25 2010 at 4:47 AM EST

AGW

I don't think anyone can deny the climate changes. The question is how serious is this and what is the cause. Anthropogenic Global Warming has turned into a faith or religion and as with all religions, any evidence that this faith is unfounded is met with extreme resistance. Mankind has devestated this planet and there seems to be a lot of chaos. It's crowded - in a very short period of time (140 years) we have gone from 1 billion people to almost 7 billion people. I believe the emphasis on.... More

Add your comment

You can’t fool Mother Nature
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA

ADVERTISEMENT

About Karl Burkart

Internet entrepreneur blogs about the latest in green media and technology.

Karl's RSS Karl's profile

FROM OUR SPONSOR

Work Together. Apart. Green Tips for Your Car
Green Tips for Your Home Green Tips for Your Office

Karl's BLOGROLL

EcoGeekFast Company
MongabayPhysorg Tech
Red Green and BlueTrendHunter Eco
TreehuggerGetting Hot in Here
Triple PunditWeb Ecoist

KARL'S RECENT POSTS

THE LATEST IN GREEN TECHNOLOGY
+ add this to my site