Lure invented that forces fish to bite

Could this technology be the end of fair sportsmanship in fishing?

BIOTECH LURE: The technology utilizes chemo-sensory stimuli that activate taste sensors, resulting in nerve reflexes that force fish to swallow. (Photo: Chris-Havard Berge/Flickr)
There was once a time when going fishing was an honest way to get out and experience the ebb and flow of nature's balance; when there was an art to feeling the subtle difference between the tug of the river and the tug on your lure. But as fishing technology continues to develop, that art has been replaced with industry.
 
 
The technology, which has been developed by Louisiana State University's John Caprio, makes use of the natural impulses of a fish's sensory systems. Caprio has discovered that when a fish is exposed to certain taste stimuli, it cannot control its urge to bite.
 
"Fish learn and associate particular scents as food, but taste is an actual reflex for them. The taste of particular natural chemicals triggers a feeding response," said Caprio.
 
But the new lures developed from this technology don't just stop there. The LSU professor has teamed up with the company Mystical Tackleworks to develop a lure that bombards all aspects of a fish's sensory systems (vision, hearing, taste, smell, mechanoreception), practically disarming every tool a fish might use to avoid getting hooked.
 
Furthermore, the technology can be tweaked to provide the appropriate natural stimuli for a wide variety of different fish species. For instance, it has been developed both for catfish, which hunt primarily using taste and smell — and a staple in Caprio's home waters of Louisiana — and bass, which rely heavily on visual cues when chasing a lure.
 
Dubbed the Biopulse Lure System, the technology obviously has huge ramifications for the fishing industry.
 
"We are literally light years ahead of what's out there right now," explained Greg Mitchell, chairman and chief science officer for Mystic Tackleworks. "We won the ICAST Award in 2008, the world's top prize for fishing lures at the industry's largest competition, and this year we received the Pitney Bowes Award for the most promising new technology in the state of Connecticut."
 
Aside from their chemosensory qualities, the lures also include a self-aware sensing system that monitors the lure's luminosity, advanced swim design features which reproduce prey-like motion, scientifically developed acoustical output that emits sound frequencies that mimic prey, and ambient light and parabolic surface reflectors. They even come with an anti-microbial cleaning solution squeeze bottle.
 
The only thing the lures don't happen to come with are ready-caught fish. For now, fishermen will still be required to actually go fishing, cast their lines, and reel them in.


Comments(23)

Sort by:


Learn how to fish

This is insane fishing is suppose to about learning and relaxing follow this link this guy will show how its done
http://www.blogtext.org/bigfish/



Light Years, distance travelled in a fixed time.

The time (in the context of a light year) is constant - one year, I don't know where you're getting this thousand year thing from.

A light year the is the distance traveled in _said one year_. There is no other way a light year can be used (such as a measure of time) unless you change the definition of light year itself.

Anyway, I'm just saying what everyone else is saying. About the lure, it's interesting that they can do this and you should never stop knowledge, but please don't sell.... More



I have been using this type of lure all of my life

It is called "Live Bait".



Weighing in on fish

It's pretty obvious that most of these comments are made by people of general ignorance, or by those who are anti anything they deem improper. This lure may indeed make it easier to catch fish, but it is the individual state and federal wildlife authorities that control fish populations. Limits are set to provide sustainability and healthy populations by species. The species are monitored constantly, as are the fishermen. The funding for all this research and law enforcement is paid almost.... More



WD40

You can do the same thing by spraying WD40 on your fishing lure. It's illegal because of environmental laws, but it works



A better way to destroy Nature?

From a fisherman's perspective, i would have to say any responsible fisherman out there would be returning the fish after the catch and maybe a photo taken. Unless of course you are actually fishing for food in which you only keep what you need. The rest are released back to the water. Not all fisherman fish just to kill fish and to label us all is ignorent.



common sense

and there it is folks this guy said it right only keep a few for eating and return the others http://www.blogtext.org/bigfish/



A better way to destroy nature

Enter your comments here Great, just what the world needs: another hi-tech way for humans to kill other creatures without skill or interaction. Why not just throw sticks of dynamite into the lake or stream? Jerks.



"No to B.L.S!!!" says Charlie the Tuna!

Yes, that means you bad B.L.S. (Biopulse Lure System), people you. You can apologize to your own children and grandchildren as to what you say and do or not say and not do. That will be one saaaad day. Greed and lust for power take folks to new lows. This is species decimation for profit- and it will happen fast. I do hospice care- and I can tell you it won't be worth it on your day out of this world. You will regret a lot. The ultimate loss. Sigh.....



fish from the future agree

light years ahead fish.



WTF WTF

This discussion is about fishes lure and not about light years...those of you who talked about light years have really messy minds which are called "IDIOTS". Please don't be angry on me as im just helping you understand things.

NEways the article is great and that's a nice discovery for fish industry until they start selling this for commercial use (Please don't do that).



In fact a light year does represent time

A light year is the distance that light would travel OVER THE COURSE OF A YEAR (time). Hence if something is many light years ahead, that distance CAN be represented by the AMOUNT OF TIME it would take to get there.



In fact a light year does not represent time

In fact, you're wrong. In fact, a light year is a measure of distance. If I wanted to refer to the time it took light to travel the distance of "one light year", I would simply say "one year". In fact, some people speak in ignorance as if they are intelligent. In fact, they are not.



literally light years

Whether it measures distance or time, the problem is that this presumably otherwise intelligent scientist said "We are literally light years ahead of what's out there right now," meaning that, without exaggeration, he is located either thousands of years in the future or millions of miles away, somewhere far out in space. Help stop "literally" abuse: http://literally.barelyfitz.com/



hhmmm

Sounds like a sales pitch in the form of "breaking news"



1000 years does not equal a light year

Light years are a measure of distance. It's like saying they are a "country mile" ahead of the compertition or "miles in front",



Lure invented that forces fish to bite

I can just see us fishing all the fish out the sea with something like this.



Already doing it

We're already on target to fish the ocean to extinction even without this lure... but it could speed up the process a bit I suppose.



errr... How?

Most lures are used in freshwater fishing, and there are some people that go surf fish, but the big threat to fish stocks (especially in the oceans) is commercial fishing which doesn't use lures.

So in what way will this speed up depletion of oceanic fishing stocks?



Light years huh?

@ BJ

Like 1000 years?!? Dude, get your facts straight if you're gonna troll on someone like that. A light year is DISTANCE not TIME. I'll give you a moment .... aaaaah yeah there it is, that my friend is the feeling of being a douchebag. Congratulations!!!



the lightyear is a unit of distance

@BJ



Light years

Literally light years ahead eh? So we shouldn't even know about this lure for like 1000 years.



plain wrong

WTF!!! This is the worst thing i have EVER heard.

Add your comment

You can’t fool Mother Nature
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA

ADVERTISEMENT

FROM OUR SPONSOR

MNN ORIGINALS

Not sure which green way is best? Get answers from our experts.

We've got a new contest coming soon.

Government data you need to know, in a way you can understand.

Check out eco-photos of the week, top 10 lists and more.

Learn more about everything from acid rain to wildlife.