The green grinch
Link
EMAIL
Stumble
Tweet
link:
| « Previous Weatherize this: Chimney Balloons | Next » Dewing the right thing? |
Comments(17)
Posted By A Siegel - Tue, Dec 22 2009 at 10:21 AM ESTHow about "takes one to know one"
"Nothing is so obnoxious as a fanatic who believes in a falsehood."
Except, WJR, you are promoting multiple falsehoods here:
1. Cleaning up our energy system, including energy efficiency, will lead to an improved quality of life, not "19th century". The National Academy of Sciences recently reported that the pollution impacts of US burning fossil fuel costs at least $120 billion per year in health impacts -- alone. Our wasteful energy habits make us less competitive.... More
Posted By wjr - Tue, Dec 22 2009 at 3:59 PM ESTModels and reality
Oh my. Struck a nerve, did I?
There a few reality based things that need to be dealt with in regard to you counter post.
Let's break your first comment up into two parts.
The first is, what amounts to, a delivery argument. No one wants waste of any resource. However, waste occurs for physical reasons. Given our current technology -- i.e. lacking room temperature super conductors -- there is no power grid design that can even approach a fraction of optimum energy transfer..... More
Posted By amy - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 7:04 PM ESToh, joyous time of the year!
the real question is: if you don't believe in global warming and you have no desire to make measurable changes in your life to help combat the real threats that exist to our planet, then why are you reading this blog or this site? have you nowhere else to express your idiotic vitriol? yes, cindy dear, it is totally up to each person to decide what they put on their property and how they use their energy. but if every person had your small brain and bad attitude, then the environment would be.... More
Posted By Laura - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 6:04 PM ESTin the Middle
Wow... to everyone posting angry go **** yourself sort of messages, what is it about the idea of possibly saving a little energy that makes you so angry? I agree it is a persons right to put up as many and what ever type of lights they want, but that doesn't necessarily make it a good idea. And for those of you who want to start with the "global warming for sure doesn't exist crap", I seriously doubt you have done enough or even any research to come to that point of veiw. And even, for the.... More
Posted By Drill_Thrawl - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 10:32 PM ESTEnvrioWeenies are Watermelons
The suggestion that these lights be restricted or totally banned is what set people off. Just another lefty\greeny trying to control other peoples lives.
Posted By Haha - Tue, Dec 22 2009 at 2:51 PM ESTwatermelons?
Just another backwater conservative trying to win out at all costs.
Posted By wjr - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 5:25 PM ESTAn "Eco Living Expert"?
I doubt that. Really just another arrogant greenie with an enormous sense of guilt about not living in a cold cave.
Go get a life and quit it with the self flagellation.
Posted By Rachelle - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 4:40 PM ESTthe green grinch
Enter your comments here Go **** yourself with a broken lightbulb.
Posted By PG - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 4:32 PM ESTWhere will this madness end???
Apparently the Enviro-Nazis haven't educated themselves about the CRU-East Anglia email leak and what it shows - THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING. So, I guess we should all curtail our Christmas celebrations and decorations to help combat a problem that doesn't even exist. Insane.
Posted By Phil Signet - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 5:50 PM ESTI agree...
...that worrying about one man's christmas lights is going overboard.
But blanket statements of "global warming doesn't exist" which most likely is based on the email feud between scientist in Britain, is just a really foolish statement.
Posted By nancy - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 4:16 PM ESTgreen grinch
I more concerned about gasbags like Al Gore & Nancy Pelosi flying to Copenhagen for the afternoon, than some poor guy who likes to put up Christmas lights once a year (and has .oooooooooooo1% of their "carbon footprint")
Posted By Cindy - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 4:11 PM ESTCarbon footprint, my eye.
I think it's none of your darn business what others choose to do on THEIR property with energy they PAY FOR.
Posted By Drill_Thrawl - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 4:03 PM ESTFrom My Cold Dead Hands
You can have my incadescent c9 lights when you pry them from my cold dead hands!
Posted By John - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 3:55 PM ESTLove the lights!
Since man-made global warming is total bunk, I say bring on the lights. The more the merrier!
Posted By Robin Shreeves - Mon, Dec 21 2009 at 12:28 PM ESTWe have scaled back
Two years ago when the lights around our outside garland went we decided not to replace them. Now we just do a few candles in the windows, a lit wreath on the door and the Christmas tree lights that can be seen through the living room window.
As for replacing regular strings of lights with LED's - I believe they should only be replaced once they go bad. Here's why. If you replace your lights, you can donate your old ones, but then someone else will still be using them. You can throw.... More
Greenie nonsense
Amy,
You are going to see a lot more of this sort of comment. Many, many people are tired of being preached to by folks like you. Those of your belief (the Greens) have lied in the referred journals, lied about data manipulation and lied about the raw data.
Are there environmental problems? Yes, for certain. But the driving force that would make all of us poor and living a 19th Century energy consumption life (not so very nice even if you assume the bogus claims of the.... More