Advice | Community | State Reports | Videos | Photos | Blogs
Join | Login
 
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Earth Matters Lifestyle Technology Business Transportation Home Food Family
  • Green News Roundup
  • Our Bloggers
  • MNN TV
  • Community
  • State Reports
  • Videos
  • Photos
  • Climate Change
  • Wilderness & Resources
  • Energy
  • Politics
  • Translating Uncle Sam
  • Cars
  • Planes, trains, bikes
  • Shipping
  • Green Office
  • Finance
  • Green Jobs
  • Building, Products, Supplies
  • Research & Innovations
  • Computers
  • Gadgets & Electronics
  • Cooking & Recipes
  • Farms & Gardens
  • Markets & Groceries
  • Dining Out
  • Beer
  • Wine & Spirits
  • Building & Remodeling
  • Interior & Design
  • Gardening & Landscaping
  • Household Products
  • Recycling
  • Beauty & Fashion
  • Books
  • Ecollywood
  • Health & Well-being
  • My Green Day
  • Travel
  • Pets & Animals
  • Baby
  • Education & Activities
  • Holiday
MNN.COM > MNN BLOGGERS > Jim Motavalli's Blog

Jim Motavalli

Hydrogen hopes: Can they restore funding for fuel cells?

Energy Secretary Steven Chu "zeroed out" hydrogen funding, but a small band of advocates want to restore the cuts.
Fri, May 22 2009 at 3:42 PM EST
Read more: HYDROGEN FUEL

A Honda FCX fuel-cell car: The end of U.S. funding? (Credit: Honda)

 

Fuel-cell advocates are none too happy about Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu’s abrupt decision earlier this month to cancel $100 million in hydrogen funding.
 
In a joint statement, the U.S. Fuel Cell Council and the National Hydrogen Association said, “The cuts proposed in the DOE hydrogen and fuel-cell program threaten to disrupt commercialization of a family of technologies that are showing exceptional promise and beginning to gain market traction. Fuel-cell vehicles are not a science experiment. These are real vehicles with real marketability and real benefits. Hundreds of fuel-cell vehicles have collectively logged millions of miles.”
 
The groups had asked for $1.2 billion in funding, but now the tally is down to $68 million for stationary fuel cells to be used as backup power. But the advocates think he can still be reasoned with. Robert Rose, executive director of the U.S. Fuel Cell Council, says he thinks the energy secretary has been too busy to focus on hydrogen, and he hopes Congress will reverse the decision. “We aren’t giving up on Dr. Chu,” he said.
 
Chu evidently got an earful at a hearing of the Senate Energy and Water Subcommittee May 19. According to Dr. C.E. “Sandy” Thomas, a passionate hydrogen advocate who heads H2Gen and was in attendance, Chu took some flak. Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) said he was “stunned” by the flat funding for hydrogen, calling it a “significant mistake” that was “not a smart thing to do.” He said he will “do everything we can to restore the program.” Dorgan also said that the program was 10 years old, preceding George W. Bush’s occupancy of the White House, and had been making significant progress.
 

Also offering complaints, though not about hydrogen, was Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), who complained that Chu was not returning her calls. More to the point, J. Byron McCormick, GM’s former fuel-cell chief, resigned from a DOE hydrogen advisory group when the funding cut was announced. “As I thought about the decision, how it was worded, and the fact that the budget was zeroed, I didn’t feel I could in any way appear to be supportive,” he said.

 

  • Comments (5)
  • Link
  • EMAIL
  • Bookmark and Share
  • RSS
  • Stumble Stumble
  • Tweet Tweet
CLOSE link:
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.
« Previous
The turning point? MNN and Slate debate the car's electric future
   Next »
Shriner cars: Who's got the hidden history?

Comments(5)

  • ALL COMMENTS
  • READERS' SELECTIONS
  • POST A COMMENT
Sort by:
Posted By Kurt C. - Sat, Jun 27 2009 at 4:43 AM EST

Fuel Emission.........

Cash for Clunkers 2009 is already generating some controversy, as many hopefuls are wondering just how they're going to be able to participate. Well, the Cash for Clunkers 2009 website says right on the website – which is located at www.cars.gov – that it isn't in effect yet. Cash for Clunkers is a program that was created by President Obama, as a car allowance rebate system, wherein people trade in their used vehicles.... More

  • reply
Posted By Gary K - Tue, Jun 16 2009 at 5:55 AM EST

Alternate use of Conventional Energy

Enter your comI would really like to see the EPA-OBD II Annual Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law closely examined, and changed.As it stands right now, it is entirely possible for any Gasoline powered Vehicle, from 1996 to the present, to fail it's Emissions Inspection, for not emitting enough Polluting Exhaust Emissions ! All such Vehicles have on board Oxygen [O2] Exhaust Sensors.These O2 Sensors are set up to detect a level of Polluting Exhaust Emissions that would indicate that Gasoline is.... More

  • reply
Posted By dofus kamas - Sun, May 24 2009 at 11:48 PM EST

http://www.playerassist.com/dofus/

the car is beautiful

  • reply
Posted By Garry G - Sun, May 24 2009 at 10:12 AM EST

Cutting funding was a mistake

I agree that cutting funding was short-sighted and feeds into the currently over-hyped expectations of what batteries alone can do for this transition from mechanical engines and liquid fuels to electric motors powered by the 'integration' of batteries, fuel cells and capacitors. Cars are not iPods, and not one device will be enough. I cringe at the notion that 'plugging into' a wall socket is somehow going to be cheap/easy or solve our problems. It's a mistake on every level from design,.... More

  • reply
Posted By Anonymous - Mon, May 25 2009 at 9:42 AM EST

Who you gonna believe?

Who you gonna believe? An administration that rejected science at every turn in its decision making and supported H2 because they thought it was "cool", or one that actually looks at the thermodynamics and economics of proposed solutions? A Nobel laureate in physics whose only interest here is the best use of the money, or a special interest group like the "hydrogen community" whose livelihood depends on endless taxpayer funding?

H2 is a waste of time/resources. If the automakers want to.... More

  • reply

Add your comment

You can't fool Mother Nature
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

ADVERTISEMENT

About Jim Motavalli

New York Times contributor blogs about green transportation.

Jim's RSS Jim's profile

From our sponsors

  • Recycling is No Longer Optional
  • Nutrition: Making a Good Dog Great
  • Quiz: Test Your Recycling Knowledge
  • 50 Money Saving Tips for Your Home
  • Taking Action on Climate Change
  • More Beer, Less Water
  • How We Made Our Car Run on Grease
  • Pure Water Makes Pure Vodka
  • The Business Case for Sustainability

Mother Nature. Delivered.

MNN's weekly newsletter sent straight to your inbox.
Follow us on Twitter Fan us on Facebook

JIM'S RECENT POSTS

EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT GREEN TRANSPORTATION
  • Should I drive my Toyota?
  • Sudden acceleration: Electronic interference could be a cause
  • Sudden acceleration: What to do when it happens to you
  • Read Jim's Blog
+ add this to my site


Quick Links

  • Earth Matters
  • Transportation
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Food
  • Home
  • Lifestyle
  • Family

 

  • Advice
  • Community
  • State Reports
  • Videos
  • Photos
  • Blogs

MNN Tools

  • Join MNN
  • Newsletters
  • RSS
  • Eco-glossary
  • Widgets
  • MNN Contests
  • MNN Lists
  • MNN Mobile

All About MNN

  • About us
  • Advisory Board
  • Press
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy
  • Terms of service
  • Contact us

 

Copyright © 2010 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by COLOCUBE
 
SPONSORS