• Welcome
  • Community
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Join
  • Log in
Follow MNN    
MNN - Mother Nature Network - Envrionmental News
improve your world

 

Saturday, May 26, 2012
  • Earth Matters

    Browse All » Animals Weather Energy Politics Space Translating Uncle Sam Wilderness & Resources

  • Health

    Browse All » Allergies Fitness & Well-Being Healthy Spaces

  • Lifestyle

    Browse All » Arts & Culture Travel Natural Beauty & Fashion Recycling Responsible Living

  • GREEN TECH

    Browse All » Computers Gadgets & Electronics Research & Innovations Transportation

  • Eco-Biz & Money

    Browse All » Green Workplace Personal Finance Sustainable Business Practices

  • Food & Drink

    Browse All » Beverages Healthy Eating Recipes

  • Your Home

    Browse All » At Home Organic Farming & Gardening Remodeling & Design

  • family

    Browse All » Babies & Pregnancy Family Activities Pets Protection & Safety

Tweet
Pin It
Email Bookmark and ShareShare
WorldShares lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20 points now.
Learn More

Earn Points
What's this?
MNN.COM›

MNN BLOGGERS

Matt Hickman

Colossal concrete eco-estate under construction in the Ozarks

A concrete kingpin is behind an energy-efficient 'residential chateau' in rural Missouri that's built to withstand an F-5 tornado. And then there's this not-so-small tidbit: The home measures 72,000 square feet.

Mon, Jul 18 2011 at 9:03 PM EST
 22

 
Back in May after a particularly destructive twister all but wiped the small Missouri town of Joplin off of the map, I blogged about the feasibility of tornado-proof homes. As it turns out, while not impossible to build, a home designed to deflect projectiles being hurled through the air at 250 miles per hour doesn’t come cheap, as fastidiously engineered dwellings with “missile-resistant” doors, walls, windows and roofs can bump construction costs up at least 20 percent compared to “normal” homes.
 
And then there’s Steven Huff. As reported by the Springfield News-Leader, the chairman of Wisconsin-based TF Concrete Forming Systems is erecting the storm shelter to end all storm shelters: Pensmore, a 72,000-square-foot aboveground concrete (natch) bunker located about 30 miles north of Ozarkian retiree magnet/dinner theatre hotspot Branson in rural Christian County, Mo.
 
At 72,000 square feet, Pensmore is about 15,000 square feet larger than Candy Spelling’s just-sold-for-$85 million shack in Holmby Hills. It's also larger than the White House (55,000 square feet), Hearst Castle (60,645 square feet), and Bill Gates' Lake Washington estate (66,000 square feet). 
 
Once you wrap your head around the sheer size of the Midwest concrete barron’s new digs — Gawker notes that the normally the only things “72,000 square feet in size, made primarily of concrete, and tucked away in a rural mountainous areas” are state penitentiaries — consider this: Huff is not only building his massive country estate to be tornado-proof — the home can “protect its inhabitants even in the midst of an F-5 tornado” according to the Pensmore website — but to be extremely eco-friendly as well.
 
 
 
Can a 72,000-square-foot “residential chateau” with a 4,000-square-foot garage, 13 bedrooms and two elevators even be eco-friendly? Huff seems to think so.
 
With rainwater collection systems, solar thermal heat collectors, “advanced climate control software,” a super-insulated energy-storing concrete shell, and other eco bells and whistles, Huff and the home’s designers fancy Pensmore “a modern, practical implementation of the Jeffersonian concept of independence and sustainability.” Additionally, the home is described as “a laboratory for exploring different methods of creating and storing usable energy that can be applied on a broad scale across commercial and residential structures.” 
 
Aside from the innovative sustainable technologies integrated into the concrete behemoth's design, Huff believes his home’s greenest attribute to be its durability. Reads the Pensmore website: “Designed to endure for centuries, the chateau will leave a minimum impact on the environment while other structures are built, demolished and built again and again.”
 
Head over to the Springfield News-Leader to see construction photos and to learn more about this massive project that, along with news of a dead body found in a Wal-Mart parking lot, is the talk of the town in the Springfield/Ozark/Branson region (probably much to the chagrin of overwhelmed-with-phone-calls Todd Wiesehan, the planning and zoning administrator for Christian County).
 
Although I can certainly appreciate Pensmore’s numerous green features as detailed on the project website, I’m unclear as to why the home has to be 72,000 square feet. I mean, really ... 72,000 square feet? And I know I’ve asked this question several times before but I’ll ask it again: Do you think a home of such substantial size can truly be labeled as green? 
 
Via [Springfield News-Leader] via [Gawker]
 
Image: Pensmore homepage

 

Previous Post
Not of the garden variety: Trugs and twine
   Next Post
Animal attraction: West Elm's fall menagerie
You might also like:
Related Topics: Energy Efficiency, Green Architecture, Green Building, Real Estate, Tornado

Comments

Follow this conversation
Add your comment
View:
  • All (22)

anonymous
Wayne 09/28/2011 13:15 PM

Classic example about the rich, and in this case the rich making money from the poor of the country, by how he achieves his money. This is to show how clear it is to say the rich need to give back more in taxes. Stop giving our money to the rich, and stop not raising their tax. If they want to enjoy this lifestyle it's ok, just make them pay their "FAIR" share.

"FAIR SHARE"

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Enter your name 09/06/2011 03:01 AM

Instead of a ridiculous, 75,000 square foot residence for a single family, how 'bout doing something that's actually useful - like building a 75,000 square foot, energy-efficient corporate headquarters?

Geez.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Enter your name 09/06/2011 02:56 AM

No mention of the fact that by surrounding yourself with concrete, you're surrounding yourself with radiation.

Just though the loons shrieking over radiation levels a continent plus an ocean away might want to know.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Enter your name 09/06/2011 02:53 AM

Uh, yeah. 'Cause nothing says "eco-friendly" like a 72,000 square foot residence.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Eric 07/31/2011 17:56 PM

wow, understated! haha-- well if the homeowners want to CONSERVE on ANY level, maybe they can get an 8-car garage from clopay. clopay's so eco-friendly, it might shrink the carbon footprint. http://www.clopaydoor.com/green.aspx

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
X 07/27/2011 19:53 PM

Is the "body found in a wal-mart parking lot" crack meant to be a knock on the residents of the Ozarks? At least that's how the people here have been taking it.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Liz 07/22/2011 22:43 PM

Yes, the house is big and probably more than anyone actually 'needs.' but its construction will show that being green doesn't mean sacrificing anything, and God forbid we should sacrifice anything to save the planet from the real and immediate threat of climate change. and if in a century or so, if no one is living there, then it will be a magnificent tourist attraction where we can go and enjoy the beauty someone created. i don't begrudge anyone wealth if they acquire it without hurting or.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
votscommink@aol.com 07/22/2011 19:47 PM

HIMSELF NOW RETIRED NOW AND WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A NEW
40' WINNEBAGO MOTORHOME AND BE A FULL TIME SNOWBIRD
TO ENJOY THE AMERICAN DREAM BUT I COULD NOT AFORD IT.
SOMETHING'S GOING ON WITH THIS PICTURE.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
mike m 07/22/2011 19:03 PM

It may be ECO but it's stupid...I work on these projects on the heating side and they gobble up massive resources. This is excessive bordering on evil!

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ron 07/22/2011 18:34 PM

Yup it can be green. Since when does green mean we have to live in a box and wipe our rear with leaves. Size doesn't matter if he is striving to be neutral. The sheer number of people that see this and are in awe will lead to awareness of new technologies and hopefully lead to others building the same. If they can afford it. Nope I am all for this. Doing stuff like this is reward for working hard in life and achieving something. This new bailout/handout society we now have where everyone.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Hmmmm 07/22/2011 18:25 PM

The thing here is you need to make a big statement when you have new technology to show the world. If you read about all he is doing it is only to show the potential. If a house his size can be efficient surely there are things we can do to ours as well. Concrete is something the Germans have been doing for decades now. The pure thickness of my German rental house i lived in for 5 years was amazing. It holds heat amazingly well. Well anyhow we all cant have this but I for one will be.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Marine57 07/22/2011 18:48 PM

Having the selfless compassion to build 50 nice homes for those who can't afford one makes a far bigger statement than selfishness.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Marine57 07/22/2011 15:41 PM

No matter how efficient or "eco" the house is, the absolute amounts of natural resources used to build and maintain such a place is far greater (on the order of 40 times) than my 17-year-old standard stick-built home with none of the advanced technology.
Utter foolishness that thing is ...

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ron 07/22/2011 18:27 PM

I bet he is creating more jobs in that area then you are sitting behind your computer being jealous.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Marine57 07/22/2011 18:44 PM

Not jealous, Ron. Offended.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 07/22/2011 19:26 PM

I still cant see it. Yes it uses more resources ok fine. Hes growing his own fuel and all the tech he will have in the house will maintain a net zero effect after construction. I think everyone is in the mindset of the mc mansions of the past where they consume 40x more than everyone else constantly. I will say that the trucks bringing the stuff don't run on love and I will say yes the materials are more but...... Its going to be there for a long time. Concrete lasts hundreds of.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Marine57 07/22/2011 20:02 PM

Ron:
Thank you, sir, for having an honest respect for everyone to have their own opinion.
Here is an example of the underlying principle for my being offended:
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country." Former President John F. Kennedy.
To apply this principle of life to the 72,000 sq/ft situation:
"Ask not what you can do for yourself; ask what you can do for others."
The work of this application of the original principle.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
TheLeftCoast 07/22/2011 14:02 PM

Geodesic dome homes are the best for withstanding natural disasters. They're built using an architectural concept called Tensegrity.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 02/01/2012 21:32 PM

If your Geodesic dome is made of thick concrete you would probably be correct. However, in this case you're simply wrong.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Rita 07/22/2011 13:12 PM

If everyone built a home this big, there wouldn't be very many people because there is not enough land for everyone to do so. Thorstein Veblen said it best "conspicuous consumption". This house is an example of arrogance taken to a ridiculous extreme. The $$ that go into this could be put to so much better use.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Anonymous 02/01/2012 21:38 PM

The arrogance is committed not when successful people use their earnings to their own benefit, but rather when the radical socialists demonize them for not using their wealth in a pre-approved liberal manner. Cheers.

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

anonymous
Ruzz 07/22/2011 12:30 PM

A few quick observations:

- first of all, the concrete business must be very, very good. Even in Missouri, this must be costing a ginormous amount of cash.

- I have recently read articles about decaying old estates and huge old mansions that go untended. Why would this one be any different? How many people now or in the future - future centuries as the blog says - can afford to live in a 72k sq ft home...how many would even WANT to? What is it going to cost simply to keep it.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
    Log in or
    create an account
     
    •  
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use

EDITORS' PICKS

tease to asteroids

tease to pet facials

tease to emotional eating

ADVERTISEMENT

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered

CONNECT WITH MNN

Follow @twitterapi
 Tumblr
 Google +

About Matt Hickman

Eco-living expert blogs about best ways to go green at home.

RSS feedMore about Matt

Recent Posts

  • Playing Catch up: 'Til Tuesday
  • Composting that cuppa: PG Tips launches tea bag recycling initiative
  • No, you're not hallucinating: Designer unveils wooden light bulb
+ Add this to my site
From our sponsor

Calculate the amount of water you use to wash dishes

New Ziploc® VersaGlass™ Containers make saving water and time a snap! more >

Photo gallery: 6 most pesky warm weather bugs

Don’t let annoying bugs ruin your outdoor fun. Keep insects out with plant-based... more >

Play the Glade Decor Scents Fragrance Photo Hunt

Test your skills of observation by spotting all five differences in each pair of... more >

Healthy home, happy family: Facts about SC Johnson products

Being a fifth generation family business gives SC Johnson a unique perspective.... more >

What’s Inside SC Johnson: A look at our product ingredients

As a family company, SC Johnson goes beyond industry standards in creating... more >
SC Johnson: A family company since 1886

Matt's BLOGROLL

Design BoomDwell
GOODCo.Design
Jetson GreenCurbed National
Core77TreeHugger
NY Times Home & GardenL.A. at Home

ADVERTISEMENT



Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Advisory Board
  • Editors' Blog
  • Press
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Service
  • WorldShares

MNN Tools

  • Advice
  • Blogs
  • Day in History
  • Eco-glossary
  • Infographics
  • Lists
  • Photos
  • Videos

Connect

  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Contests
  • Idea Lab
  • Mixed Greens
  • Newsletters
  • Polls
  • RSS

Channels

  • Earth Matters
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Green Tech
  • Eco-Biz & Money
  • Your Home
  • Family
  • State Reports

Follow MNN

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Google+
  • StumbleUpon
 

Copyright © 2012 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE
 
SPONSORS