Soft on the bum, hard on the earth
In terms of eco-impact, America's preference for soft toilet paper is "worse than driving Hummers," states NRDC scientist.

Environmentalists are focusing on tissue products for reasons besides the loss of trees. Turning a tree to paper requires more water than turning paper back into fiber, and many brands that use tree pulp use polluting chlorine-based bleach for greater whiteness. In addition, tissue made from recycled paper produces less waste tonnage — almost equaling its weight — that would otherwise go to a landfill.Still, trees and tree quality remain a contentious issue. Although brands differ, 25 percent to 50 percent of the pulp used to make toilet paper in this country comes from tree farms in South America and the United States. The rest, environmental groups say, comes mostly from old, second-growth forests that serve as important absorbers of carbon dioxide, the main heat-trapping gas linked to global warming. In addition, some of the pulp comes from the last virgin North American forests, which are an irreplaceable habitat for a variety of endangered species, environmental groups say.
"Future generations are going to look at the way we make toilet paper as one of the greatest excesses of our age. Making toilet paper from virgin wood is a lot worse than driving Hummers in terms of global warming pollution." Hershkowitz adds: "I really do think it is overwhelmingly an American phenomenon. People just don't understand that softness equals ecological destruction."
Via [The New York Times] and [The Guardian]
Photo: Caro's Lines
link:
| Previous Post Gone to the dogs | Next Post Playing catch up: Super-powered linkage |

































