• Welcome
  • Community
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Join
  • Log in
Follow MNN    
MNN - Mother Nature Network - Envrionmental News
improve your world

 

Saturday, May 26, 2012
  • Earth Matters

    Browse All » Animals Weather Energy Politics Space Translating Uncle Sam Wilderness & Resources

  • Health

    Browse All » Allergies Fitness & Well-Being Healthy Spaces

  • Lifestyle

    Browse All » Arts & Culture Travel Natural Beauty & Fashion Recycling Responsible Living

  • GREEN TECH

    Browse All » Computers Gadgets & Electronics Research & Innovations Transportation

  • Eco-Biz & Money

    Browse All » Green Workplace Personal Finance Sustainable Business Practices

  • Food & Drink

    Browse All » Beverages Healthy Eating Recipes

  • Your Home

    Browse All » At Home Organic Farming & Gardening Remodeling & Design

  • family

    Browse All » Babies & Pregnancy Family Activities Pets Protection & Safety

Tweet
Pin It
Email Bookmark and ShareShare
WorldShares lets you earn donations for your favorite nonprofit. Earn up to 20 points now.
Learn More

Earn Points
What's this?
MNN.COM›

MNN BLOGGERS

Matt Hickman

Green McMansions: (Oxy)moronic?

Should these green giants be legitimized by the green building community and environmentalists? Or are they just a bad idea?

Mon, Feb 16 2009 at 4:57 PM EST

Photo by garyhymes
Green building tends to be defined by these adjectives: Efficient, compact, careful — and ostentatious, but only in innovation. Here are some words that could be used to describe the McMansion trend: Wasteful, rambling, impersonal — and ostentatious, in all senses of the word. What happens when “green” meets “McMansion?” When good intention meets conspicuous consumption? I’ll let you be the judge…
 
Although the concept of Green McMansions hit a fever pitch last spring and then literally went down in flames, they are still being built (and also rapidly being foreclosed) despite nationwide interest in smaller homes. In fact, a highly visible green building project, HGTV’s 2008 Green Home, may be considered a green McMansion by some. At 2,000 square feet, I think it’s about 1,000 square feet or so short of achieving this dubious distinction.
 
What do you think? Can a 3,000 square foot plus home with an inherently large footprint be dubbed as "green" because of ENERGY STAR appliances, low-VOC paints, recycled content carpeting, water-saving fixtures, and other features associated with green homes? Is it fair to criticize eco-minded folks who can afford more square footage? Do the words “green” and “McMansion” negate each other?
 
MNN's own Siel Ju has a great point in a post written for Low Impact Living last fall: If large homes are going to be built anyway, why not make them as environmentally friendly as possible? 
 
To bring you up to speed on the issue, I’ve assembled a list of articles discussing this mega-sized phenomenon of debatable eco-friendliness. Following the links are two videos that show green McMansion building at two extremes. And following the videos is the comments section, where I'd love to hear your two cents on the issue. Yay or nay? 
 
9 “Green: Monsters: Can a 15,000 SF McMansion be Green?  [TreeHugger]
Green Giants [CNN]
Are Green McMansions Really Green [RiverWired]
Big Houses Are Not Green: America’s McMansion Problem [AlternNet]
McMansions Are Not Eco-friendly [The Seattle Times]
Supersized no more: Homebuilders say the ‘McMansion era has ended in the Twin Cities [TwinCities.com] 
 
 

Previous Post
Swiss Family Prefabinson
   Next Post
MIO bueno! redux
You might also like:
Related Topics: Green Building

Comments

Follow this conversation
Add your comment
View:
  • All (1)

anonymous
Guest 02/18/2009 14:35 PM

And this is coming from someone whose fondest retirement dream is floating about a crumbling, sprawling Victorian mansion and scaring small children between spa appointments.

We always want it both ways. But the principles of expansion and restriction are and have been opposite one another since prince-sons began overthrowing king-fathers.

The 3,000 (or 2,000) sq ft home, no matter how Queenly Green, still requires more of everything to live in it and maintain it than a home.... More

  • |
  • Reply
  • report this post 

Add your comment

Sign in with one of these accounts or just add your comment below.
    Log in or
    create an account
     
    •  
Used only for emailed comments and will not be displayed with your post
Notify me with an email when other people comment on this article.
The posting of advertisement, profanity or personal attacks is prohibited.
Click here to review our Terms of Use

EDITORS' PICKS

tease to asteroids

tease to pet facials

tease to emotional eating

ADVERTISEMENT

NEWSLETTER

Mother Nature. Delivered

CONNECT WITH MNN

Follow @twitterapi
 Tumblr
 Google +

About Matt Hickman

Eco-living expert blogs about best ways to go green at home.

RSS feedMore about Matt

Recent Posts

  • Playing Catch up: 'Til Tuesday
  • Composting that cuppa: PG Tips launches tea bag recycling initiative
  • No, you're not hallucinating: Designer unveils wooden light bulb
+ Add this to my site

Matt's BLOGROLL

Design BoomDwell
GOODCo.Design
Jetson GreenCurbed National
Core77TreeHugger
NY Times Home & GardenL.A. at Home

ADVERTISEMENT



Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Advisory Board
  • Editors' Blog
  • Press
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Service
  • WorldShares

MNN Tools

  • Advice
  • Blogs
  • Day in History
  • Eco-glossary
  • Infographics
  • Lists
  • Photos
  • Videos

Connect

  • Community
  • Contact Us
  • Contests
  • Idea Lab
  • Mixed Greens
  • Newsletters
  • Polls
  • RSS

Channels

  • Earth Matters
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Green Tech
  • Eco-Biz & Money
  • Your Home
  • Family
  • State Reports

Follow MNN

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Google+
  • StumbleUpon
 

Copyright © 2012 MNN Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by GLICK INTERACTIVE | Powered by CIRRACORE
 
SPONSORS