Greening the Victorians
I’m a big fan of The Guardian’s environmental coverage, particularly of journalist Leo Hickman’s (no relation) contributions to the UK rag’s Ethical Living section. Last week, Hickman posted an entry about green home renovation in the Ethical Living blog that was part “here’s how I did it” account and part open casting call for “eco-renovators willing to share their tips, experiences and anxieties."
“But this is a reality for less than 0.1% of the population. The other 99.9% of us don't have access to the money required, and - more significantly - are lumbered with working out how to "eco[retro]fit" an existing building. As is common in Britain, that existing building can be more than 100 years old.The Victorians, for example, were a clever bunch, but when they were throwing up housing across Britain they were thinking about how to build solid houses quickly and cheaply. They weren't too bothered about U-values and air leakage rates.This mentality has largely remained in place right up to today's generation of builders. However, as concern grows about how we reduce both carbon emissions and ever-rising energy bills, and as building regulations have greatly tightened over the past few years, many of us have started to look at how we can improve the eco credentials of our current homes.It's easier said than done, as I have recently been finding out. A couple of years ago my family and I moved back to Cornwall, close to where I grew up, and bought an old, run-down farmhouse with the hope of renovating it."
"If everyone in the world used as much toilet paper as people in the UK, let alone Americans, there would not be a single tree left. It is all very well talking about the sustainability of different brands, but in truth we should all be using water sprays."