SPECIAL FEATURES:
Why I'm optimistic about 2010: Saving and going green at home
As we enter the New Year, I'm raising my glass of biodynamic champers to the success of energy and money-saving home improvement projects.
Tue, Dec 29 2009 at 6:16 PM
Related Topics:
In general, I’m a glass-mostly-empty kind of guy — like many, I fear the crushing blow of putting my faith behind something and then having it not work out to my liking — but when contemplating how things on the green “home front” will pan out in the year ahead, I’m filled with a hearty dose of eco-optimism.

I’m looking forward to tracking and reporting on various items for MNN — the continued acceptance of sustainable home design and residential architecture, eco-friendly household products, and, umm, the urban composting movement — but one thing in particular that I can’t wait to see unfold is the proposed “cash for caulkers” or Home Star program, a government-funded rebate scheme that’s similar to “cash for clunkers” but focuses on energy-saving home improvement projects instead of cars.
Submitting to a home energy audit and then making recommended changes around the home is understandably daunting, especially when often large and expensive undertakings are involved like buying new appliances, doors, windows, insulation, etc. (for cheap, DIY fix-its, check out my series of “Weatherize this” posts). But as we move into 2010 and the Home Star program is ironed out, it helps to acknowledge a bit of excellent, encouraging news.
A couple months back I wrote about Next Step Living, a Massachusetts-based energy efficiency firm that teamed up with the city of Boston for a remarkable weatherization pilot program, the Renew Boston Energy Efficiency Program, that targeted 150 working poor and middle-class households in the Boston area who couldn't afford the initial investment involved with weatherization rebate or incentive programs or do not qualify for federal weatherization assistance.
Well, the results of the pilot program are just in: through state-funded home energy audits and on-the-spot efficiency upgrades, each household will be saving an average of $200 to $300 in utility costs annually. And remember, these figures, a collective $40,000, are just after the first round of audits and improvements, so there’s more saving to come.
Says Boston Mayor Thomas Menino:
Residences account for 35 percent of all wasted energy and the city of Boston is taking advantage of this opportunity to show the country that through committed partnerships, we can make major strides in energy savings, community building and green job creation.
Although the pilot run of the Renew Boston Energy Efficiency Program operated differently than the proposed Home Star program will (a state-funded pilot program vs. a federally funded stimulus scheme) the above results are certainly a harbinger of good things to come in 2010. And I imagine things will only get better further down the line.
So, as I’ve waxed on about, my eco-optimism is firmly rooted behind increased money savings and decreased carbon footprints via energy-centric home improvement projects of all stripes. Is there anything in particular you’re optimistic about in terms of green homes in 2010? Do you have any green resolutions you'd like to share?
Photo: hallock35
The opinions expressed by MNN Bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of MNN.com. While we have reviewed their content to make sure it complies with our Terms and Conditions, MNN is not responsible for the accuracy of any of their information.
You might also like:
Sign in with one of these accounts to add your comment.

John Barksdale
Dec 31 2009 at 12:22 PM
I salute Boston's efforts to help low income homeowners weatherize thier homes. As an Austinite, I'm disgusted by any mandatory energy home audits at the point of sale. Currently, homeowners need only have an inspection, its just a matter of time before the Austin City Council mandate the repair of any deficiencies noted in the energy audits. The Austin Energy Conservation and Disclosure Ordinance mandates an energy audit for homeowners at the point of sale. However, if the abode is a mobile home
.... More
without a foundation, a condominium, or a home less than 10 years old, those homeowners can use 10,000 kilowatt hours of electricity a month and be exempt from the ECAD. Non-compliance of this ordinance is a Class C misdemeanor and up to a $2000 fine. To add insult to injury, Austin Energy is a public utility, -a regulated monopoly. If I wished to buy electricity from another provider as an Austinite, I can't. Austin Energy sells me their product as a monopoly, then tells me how I must use it. Sealing some HVAC ducts in a single-family home and adding more insulation will not abate the need to build more power plants. Solar panels don't produce electricity at night and solar generates very little electricity under a cloudy sky. Austin's hand-wringing over a harmless trace gas in the atmosphere is laughable and a serious misallocation of capital and resources.
John Barksdalehttp://stoptheaustinecad.blogspot.comidentitythefthurts@gmail(dot)com
- Log in or register to post comments
- Report This Post

Email














Join the conversation