My post yesterday on FLATS, several ambitious SRO conversion projects in Chicago’s Uptown and Edgewater neighborhoods, got me thinking: although transforming foreclosed, down-and-out, and, in some cases, completely abandoned, single room occupancy hotels into hip, micro-apartment communities is a prime opportunity for real estate developers to freshen up derelict buildings and invest in gentrifying neighborhoods, what about similar projects that don’t displace low-income and often physically and mentally disabled tenants?
Turns out, there are plenty.
Although new builds and not conversion projects, the LifeEdited blog recently featured a couple of properties, one in the Bronx and the other in Chicago, that challenge the preconception that many have about SRO buildings (i.e. “synononymous with drugs, crime, totaliarian architecture, and poor building quality.”) And as David Friedlander suggests, many SROs “enjoy a pass on restrictive building codes, allowing smaller unit sizes and larger communal areas than their conventional residential counterparts. Perhaps these developments presaged the upcoming micro-unit movement we’ve been talking so much about.”
And then there’s the Drs. Julian and Raye Richardson Apartments, a 120-unit SRO building in San Francisco’s Hayes Valley neighborhood that’s not only garnered a fair amount of acclaim for its architectural significance (the American Institute of Architects bestowed the striking five-floor complex with both the Excellence in Affordable Housing Award and a Housing Award in the multifamily category back in May) and its commitment to sustainability (the infill development is GreenPoint certified), but because of its overall livability.
In a great recent profile by Ariel Schwartz, Co.Exist dubs the Richardson Apartments as “low-income housing that anyone would want to live in.” High praise indeed.
There’s a whole lot to like about the David Baker + Partners-designed Richardson Apartments. For starters, there’s the rooftop solar arrays and allotment garden, solar hot water heating, a vegetated roof, rain gardens, sunshades, the use of low-VOC paints and finishes, and reclaimed and sustainable woods found throughout the structure. In addition to big honors from the AIA and other organizations, the complex also received a 2012 Merit Award from the Northern California chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects.
Dedicated bike parking is available to the Richardson Apartments’ 120 permanent residents, but the building’s location at Fulton and Gough Streets — an area severely impacted by the collapse of the Central Freeway during the 1989 San Francisco earthquake — is also transit-oriented and exceedingly pedestrian friendly (the development's WalkScore is 95). I should also point out that the building is named in honor of the founders of Marcus Books, the country's first independent African-American bookstore.
All said, such a support-heavy and thoughtfully designed building dedicated to providing dignified housing to very low-income residents isn’t exactly easy to score a spot in. As detailed by Co.Exist, there’s a long waiting list for those who pass an initial screening process that weeds out applicants with violent tendencies. If approved, residents pay 30 percent of their income as rent — a maximum of $870 per month — to live in the Community Housing Partnership-owned building.
If you live in the San Francisco area and are interested in learning more about the Richardson Apartments, the development is just one of several projects featured in the exhibition “From Idealism to Realism: Celebrating Public Interest Design.” The exhibition opens Oct. 4 at the Autodesk Gallery at One Market.